People in poorer neighborhoods have higher risk of sudden cardiac arrest

September 12, 2011

Sudden cardiac arrest was higher among people living in poorer neighbourhoods in several US and Canadian cities, and the disparity was particularly evident among people under age 65, found a study in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

Sudden cardiac arrest accounts for up to 63% of deaths annually from in the United States. Socioeconomic status is a predictor of many health-related conditions, including and . This study examined a potential link between socioeconomic status and in more than one community.

A team of researchers in the US and Canada looked at data on 9235 sudden cardiac arrests in seven cities: four in the US: Dallas, Texas; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Portland, Oregon; Seattle–King County, Washington; and three in Canada: Ottawa and Toronto, Ontario; and Vancouver, British Columbia.

The researchers looked at people who had cardiac arrests at home, a nursing home or assisted-living facility. They used census tract data on household incomes for the location of cardiac arrests to determine socioeconomic status.

"The incidence of sudden cardiac arrest was significantly higher in the neighbourhoods of lowest versus highest in six of the seven metropolitan areas studied," writes Dr. Sumeet Chugh, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, with coauthors.

Median household income was $50 000 to $63 000 US dollars, with income in the lowest socioeconomic group ranging from $30 000 to $41 000 and in the highest socioeconomic group from $72 000 to $97 000. In Pittsburgh, incomes were significantly lower ($21 000 and $54 000 respectively.)

"At all seven sites, disparities in the incidence of sudden cardiac arrest across socioeconomic quartiles were greatest among people less than 65 years old. Compared with the incidence in the highest quartile, the incidence in the lowest quartile was two- to fourfold greater in the US sites, and up to threefold greater in the Canadian sites," they write. "As with all ages combined, disparities across socioeconomic quartiles among people younger than 65 were significant at all sites except Ottawa." Compared with the disparities among younger people, the disparities among people 65 and older were less pronounced in in the US cities and Toronto.

The trend for higher cardiac arrests increased as median income dropped and was particularly noticeable among people under 65 years of age and stronger in the US cities than in the Canadian cities. The authors state that the exact reasons for US–Canadian differences need further investigation, but data from other studies indicate that one possible explanation is Canadians' access to universal health care; which may mean they have had preventive care for cardiac issues, compared with Americans who may not seek care because of cost, particularly those younger than 65 and not yet eligible for Medicare.

"Our results showing a younger mean age of sudden cardiac arrest in the United States may be consistent with more poorly controlled cardiovascular disease," state the authors.

They conclude that population-level interventions for people in low income and better access to preventive health care may help to address these disparities.

In a related commentary, Dr. Heikki Huikuri, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oulu, Finland, writes "this study should inform the decisions of politicians and managers of health care systems as they institute health care reforms, recognizing that sudden is the single most common cause of death in western societies."

Explore further: Study uncovers novel genetic variation linked to increased risk of sudden cardiac arrest

Related Stories

Study uncovers novel genetic variation linked to increased risk of sudden cardiac arrest

June 30, 2011
A study by a global consortium of physician-scientists has identified a genetic variation that may predispose people to double the risk of having a sudden cardiac arrest, a disorder that gives little warning and is fatal ...

200,000 patients treated for cardiac arrest annually in US hospitals, study shows

June 24, 2011
More than 200,000 people are treated for cardiac arrest in United States hospitals each year, a rate that may be on the rise. The findings are reported online this week in Critical Care Medicine in a University of Pennsylvania ...

Survival predictors of cardiac arrest in the ICU

August 15, 2011
The type of cardiac arrest suffered by patients in intensive care units (ICUs) may predict their long-term survival rate, states a study in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

Recommended for you

Could aggressive blood pressure treatments lead to kidney damage?

July 18, 2017
Aggressive combination treatments for high blood pressure that are intended to protect the kidneys may actually be damaging the organs, new research from the University of Virginia School of Medicine suggests.

Quantifying effectiveness of treatment for irregular heartbeat

July 17, 2017
In a small proof-of-concept study, researchers at Johns Hopkins report a complex mathematical method to measure electrical communications within the heart can successfully predict the effectiveness of catheter ablation, the ...

Concerns over side effects of statins stopping stroke survivors taking medication

July 17, 2017
Negative media coverage of the side effects associated with taking statins, and patients' own experiences of taking the drugs, are among the reasons cited by stroke survivors and their carers for stopping taking potentially ...

Study discovers anticoagulant drugs are being prescribed against safety advice

July 17, 2017
A study by researchers at the University of Birmingham has shown that GPs are prescribing anticoagulants to patients with an irregular heartbeat against official safety advice.

Protein may protect against heart attack

July 14, 2017
DDK3 could be used as a new therapy to stop the build-up of fatty material inside the arteries

Heart study finds faulty link between biomarkers and clinical outcomes

July 14, 2017
Surrogate endpoints (biomarkers), which are routinely used in clinical research to test new drugs, should not be trusted as the ultimate measure to approve new health interventions in cardiovascular medicine, according to ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Sep 12, 2011
I can tell you why... it's because living poor is 20x more stressfull than having plenty of money. Worrying about how you're going to pay the bills and keep the car and everyone fed is VERY stressfull. Ever had a money argument with your spouse? Not fun.
Also, it costs more to eat healthy. It costs a LOT more to eat healthy. When strapped, you find yourself eating a lot of pasta-based dishes. Also, you have to buy the offbrands that generally contain more fat and other stuff that's bad for you... they have to cut their costs to provide cheaper food, after all...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.