Philip Morris challenges plain packs in Australia

December 20, 2011

Global tobacco giant Philip Morris Tuesday stepped up its legal campaign against an Australian law banning logos and branding from cigarette packs, saying it had taken its case to the High Court.

Last month Philip Morris Asia launched a case against the government under an investment treaty with Hong Kong over the legislation, which says cigarettes can only be sold in drab, olive-brown packets.

The latest challenge, by Australia-based Philip Morris Limited (PML), is on constitutional grounds, arguing that the government has passed a law that acquires the firm's valuable brands and intellectual property.

"We believe plain packaging violates the Australian constitution because the government is seeking to acquire our property without paying compensation," PML spokesman Chris Argent said in a statement.

The company is seeking a ruling from the High Court that the government cannot stop the firm from using its intellectual property and branding on its cigarettes and packets.

Under the ground-breaking Australian law passed last month, all will need to be sold in plain packaging from December 1, 2012, which will also carry graphic .

The proposal to remove all logos and to print company names in the same font has angered tobacco firms, who quickly moved to challenge the law.

Besides Philip Morris, global giant Imperial Tobacco has launched a legal challenge in the High Court claiming that the law breaches Australia's constitution by infringing .

British American Tobacco (BAT) has filed a similar constitutional challenge.

Australia is set to be the first country to mandate plain packaging to reduce smoking rates and Attorney General Nicola Roxon, formerly the health minister, has said she is prepared for the challenges to the law.

While Canberra says costs the country more than Aus$30 billion (US$30 billion) a year in healthcare and lost productivity, the argue the government cannot prove plain packaging will cut smoking rates.

Philip Morris International has seven of the world's top 15 tobacco brands, including Marlboro, and through PML it holds about a 37.5 percent share of the Australian cigarette market.

Explore further: Philip Morris sues Australia over plain packaging

Related Stories

BAT challenges Australia cigarette packaging law

December 1, 2011

British American Tobacco on Thursday launched a High Court challenge against a law that will require plain packaging on cigarettes in Australia, claiming it infringes intellectual property rights.

Recommended for you

'Diet' products can make you fat, study shows

April 25, 2017

High-fat foods are often the primary target when fighting obesity, but sugar-laden "diet" foods could be contributing to unwanted weight gain as well, according to a new study from the University of Georgia.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Dec 20, 2011
Does seem a little unfair, especially since companies use fancy graphics and fonts to distinguish themselves from each other, and with cigarettes there are quite a few choices and brands. I believe Australia went a little overboard, and they should have just made them put the graphic images on the packs and not also strip the packs of their identities.

(Note: I am a smoker)
2 / 5 (4) Dec 20, 2011
Why not just put everyone involved with Philip Morris to death for committing crimes against humanity?

Revolution is coming. Everyone have your lists ready.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.