Pfizer recalls 1 million packets of US birth control pills

February 1, 2012

US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer on Wednesday recalled one million packets of birth control pills over a packaging error that could put women at risk of unintended pregnancy.

The pills, about half of which were the brand name Lo/Ovral-28 and the other half were generic norgestrel and ethinyl estradiol tablets, may be improperly arranged so that inactive pills are taken at the wrong time in the monthly cycle.

Doctors described the recall as "very serious" and urged women who have been taking the pills to talk with their doctor and use back-up methods of protection.

A similar recall was issued in September by a different pharmaceutical company, Qualitest in Alabama, due to packaging errors that affected 1.4 million packets of birth control pills distributed in 2011.

Pfizer said its own investigation had "found that some blister packs may contain an inexact count of inert or active ingredient tablets and that the tablets may be out of sequence," the company said in a statement.

"As a result of this packaging error, the daily regimen for these oral contraceptives may be incorrect and could leave women without adequate contraception, and at risk for unintended pregnancy."

The pills were manufactured and packaged by Pfizer in New York state and commercialized by Akrimax Rx Products under the Akrimax brand name in the United States.

Each packet is supposed to contain 21 active tablets and seven inactive pills.

"The cause of the inexact package counts has been identified and corrected," Pfizer spokeswoman Grace Ann Arnold told AFP.

She described the problem as a "mechanical and operator visual inspection systems failure on the packaging line."

Patients who have been taking the affected lot numbers, posted on the Pfizer and US Food and Drug Administration websites, should notify their physician, return the product to the pharmacy and begin using a back-up form of non-hormonal birth control right away.

"This is very, very serious," said Steven Goldstein, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at New York University Langone Medical Center. These pills "cannot be considered to be adequate contraception."

Goldstein added that the pills affected are not among the newer, low-dose pills that have risen in popularity in recent years, but may be commonly distributed by hospitals and low-cost outlets.

"It is a very old pill. It has been around for decades. There have been a number of newer, lower doses, better progestins, and it is not really marketed much anymore," he told AFP.

"A very small minority of people are probably taking this. However, anybody who is taking these packs may be at an unknown but too high of a risk for unintended pregnancy."

Gynecologist Jill Rabin at Long Island Jewish Medical Center in New York urged women who have been taking the affected pills to also get a pregnancy test.

"Sequence and content of active versus inactive pills is crucial in determining efficacy, including whether or not unwanted pregnancy will be actually prevented," she said.

"Ensure that you are not currently pregnant by taking a pregnancy test if you have any symptoms of pregnancy, such as missed periods, abnormal bleeding."

Explore further: US approves India's Ranbaxy to make generic Lipitor

Related Stories

US approves India's Ranbaxy to make generic Lipitor

December 1, 2011
Indian pharmaceutical giant Ranbaxy won US regulatory approval to make the first generic version of cholesterol lowering drug Lipitor, a Pfizer product whose patent expired Wednesday.

Study confirms some contraceptive pills more likely to cause blood clots

October 25, 2011
A study published in the British Medical Journal today confirms previous findings that certain oral contraceptive pills are more likely to cause serious blood clots (venous thromboembolism - VTE ) than others.

Recommended for you

Study suggests ending opioid epidemic will take years

July 20, 2017
The question of how to stem the nation's opioid epidemic now has a major detailed response. A new study chaired by University of Virginia School of Law Professor Richard Bonnie provides extensive recommendations for curbing ...

Team-based model reduces prescription opioid use among patients with chronic pain by 40 percent

July 17, 2017
A new, team-based, primary care model is decreasing prescription opioid use among patients with chronic pain by 40 percent, according to a new study out of Boston Medical Center's Grayken Center for Addiction Medicine, which ...

Private clinics' peddling of unproven stem cell treatments is unsafe and unethical

July 7, 2017
Stem cell science is an area of medical research that continues to offer great promise. But as this week's paper in Science Translational Medicine highlights, a growing number of clinics around the globe, including in Australia, ...

Popular heartburn drugs linked to higher death risk

July 4, 2017
Popular heartburn drugs called proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been linked to a variety of health problems, including serious kidney damage, bone fractures and dementia. Now, a new study from Washington University School ...

Most reproductive-age women using opioids also use another substance

June 30, 2017
The majority of reproductive-age and pregnant women who use opioids for non-medical purposes also use at least one other substance, ranging from nicotine or alcohol to cocaine, according to a University of Pittsburgh Graduate ...

At-risk chronic pain patients taper opioids successfully with psychological tools

June 28, 2017
Psychological support and new coping skills are helping patients at high risk of developing chronic pain and long-term, high-dose opioid use taper their opioids and rebuild their lives with activities that are meaningful ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jesse_EngAmer
not rated yet Feb 01, 2012
For a company, whose pill isn't considered cutting edge and is no longer a leading brand, to recall this many packages shows real concern for their customers. It's a good thing this got caught before any serious repercussions occurred. It's unfortunate we cannot say the same about the FDA who often put big pharma before the consumer. Just look at Vioxx: http://eng.am/mXtMkx

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.