Study of infants challenges developmental sequence of human language learning

March 9, 2012 By Bobbie Mixon
Researchers say young infants know their own name or the words 'mommy' or 'daddy.' Now, new research shows infants have knowledge about word categories that are a part of their daily life, to include words related to foods and body parts. Credit: Elika Bergelson, Psychology Department, University of Pennsylvania

(Medical Xpress) -- Suppose a baby's first word is "mommy" or "daddy"--words an infant usually says around his or her first birthday. Of course, the little cherub puts a gleam in her parents' eyes; she's finally talking and is well on her way to becoming the next big opera star or a world famous author.

But new research says may begin understanding much sooner than previously thought. They understand the meaning of some words far earlier than parents or even social scientists theorized. In fact, before they talk, walk or point, infants know the meanings of some words merely from everyday exposure to them.

"By six months, infants understand the meaning of words related to foods and ," said Elika Bergelson, a doctoral candidate in psychology at the University of Pennsylvania, who recently conducted a study that challenges current views of the developmental sequence of learning.

Here the green dot tracks an infant's eyes as the infant looks at a hand in response to prompting by a parent. Credit: Elika Bergelson and Daniel Swingley, Psychology Department, University of Pennsylvania

"Unlike previous research, which has shown that young infants know their own name or the words 'mommy' or 'daddy,' or can be trained to learn words for novel objects in the lab, here we show that infants have knowledge about word categories that are a part of their daily life."

Since 6- to 9-month old babies normally lack language skills, researchers used eye-tracking software to gauge an infant's visual fixations on named pictures as a test of his or her word understanding. Here a parent asks an infant to look at the bottle and the eye-tracking software measures the response. Credit: Elika Bergelson and Daniel Swingley, Psychology Department, University of Pennsylvania

Bergelson and her coauthor, associate professor Daniel Swingley also with the Department of Psychology and the Institute for Research in Cognitive Science at the University of Pennsylvania, conducted the study. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences published it in its February 13 issue.

"The work by Swingley and colleagues continues a long tradition of research demonstrating that even very young infants engage in complex perceptions and inferences about the world around them," said Peter Vishton, a developmental psychologist in the National Science Foundation's Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, which partially funded the study.

"Babies can't tell us about what they know, but their looking patterns demonstrate that they make sense of the people, objects and events in their surroundings," said Vishton, "to some extent from the moment they are born."

Using a research method called "language-guided looking" or "looking-while-listening" researchers presented six- to nine-month old infants with visual displays, usually sets of two pictures. Then a parent named a picture in each set using a sentence like, "Look at the apple." Researchers then gauged the infant's visual fixations on named pictures as a measure of the infant's word understanding.

Most of the 33 infants in the study recognized most of the 20 items tested, which were food-related or body parts. Researchers compared the tests of the six to nine month olds with 50 babies 10 to 20 months old.

"We were most surprised that we found evidence of word-meaning knowledge this early," said Swingley. "We knew that infants around this age were very good at discriminating and categorizing speech sounds, but it seemed unlikely that they would be able to show word-meaning knowledge, without training, in the laboratory setting."

Prior research generally classifies infants younger than about 10-12 months as 'prelinguistic' and conventional thinking suggests word learning doesn't start until around a child's first birthday. Because of that, the researchers in this study expected to find that maybe around 9 months there might be some word recognition, but certainly not at 6-7 months.

"In the context of this tradition," said Vishton, "the current finding that 6-month-olds possess knowledge about the meanings of nouns associated with body parts is quite striking."

"The babies surprised us," said Swingley.

"The bulk of current evidence on the language abilities of 6-12 month olds document their savvy abilities to pull out various properties about the sounds of language: which sounds their language has as separate categories, where words begin and end, what kind of patterns or consistencies there are in the speech stream, etc.," said Bergelson, arguing that this leads to language acquisition theories that suggest infants younger than 10-12 months old are not yet "word learners."

"Our findings may lead to changes in the way that we understand language acquisition and its development," she said.

"In terms of the message to parents and caretakers," added Swingley, "our work suggests that young infants understand a little of what is said to them, so it makes sense to talk to them. When we talk to infants as real conversational partners, and talk about what they are interested in, we create the ideal conditions for learning.

"There's more and more work showing strong correlations between how much parents talk to their young children and those children's vocabulary size," he said. "Overheard language doesn't do it, television doesn't do it. What young children learn from best is when we treat them as real conversational partners."

Explore further: 6- to 9-month-olds understand the meaning of many spoken words: research

Related Stories

6- to 9-month-olds understand the meaning of many spoken words: research

February 13, 2012
At an age when "ba-ba" and "da-da" may be their only utterances, infants nevertheless comprehend words for many common objects, according to a new study.

Two-year-old children understand complex grammar

August 23, 2011
Psychologists at the University of Liverpool have found that children as young as two years old have an understanding of complex grammar even before they have learned to speak in full sentences.

Recommended for you

New study rebuts the claim that antidepressants do not work

August 18, 2017
A theory that has gained considerable attention in international media, including Newsweek and the CBS broadcast 60 minutes, suggests that antidepressant drugs such as the SSRIs do not exert any actual antidepressant effect. ...

Should I stay or should I leave? Untangling what goes on when a relationship is being questioned

August 17, 2017
Knowing whether to stay in or leave a romantic relationship is often an agonizing experience and that ambivalence can have negative consequences for health and well-being.

Kids learn moral lessons more effectively from stories with humans than human-like animals

August 17, 2017
A study by researchers at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto found that four to six-year-olds shared more after listening to books with human characters than books with anthropomorphic ...

History of stress increases miscarriage risk, says new review

August 17, 2017
A history of exposure to psychological stress can increase the risk of miscarriage by upto 42 per cent, according to a new review.

Study finds children pay close attention to potentially threatening information, avoid eye contact when anxious

August 17, 2017
We spend a lot of time looking at the eyes of others for social cues – it helps us understand a person's emotions, and make decisions about how to respond to them. We also know that adults avoid eye contact when anxious. ...

Communicating in a foreign language takes emotion out of decision making

August 16, 2017
If you could save the lives of five people by pushing another bystander in front of a train to his death, would you do it? And should it make any difference if that choice is presented in a language you speak, but isn't your ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Mar 09, 2012
The second video is really funny. How the baby checks out that cookie first, then it looks for some milk.. nope, no milk. An apple, no I still want some of that milk.
not rated yet Mar 09, 2012
you want to do a real test , give the baby an i/o device and let them yes no and . . . want , like , don't want , don't like , one two three , square , circle , triangle , up down left right . . . guardian to colossus , and positive reinforcement ;)
not rated yet Mar 10, 2012
Patience is virtue. Long have I waited for this aspect of research to gain recognition and acceptance.

"Babies can't tell us about what they know, but their looking patterns demonstrate that they make sense of the people, objects and events in their surroundings, to some extent from the moment they are born." - Vishton

lol - Maybe you forgot what you were thinking when you were that age. Too bad. Regardless of how important that was for you at that time, you are just now finding words, descriptions and research for what some assert to be most unique aspect of human
existence - language.

Oh. Alright. I'll help you out...

I'm listening to music. Smart researchers have plastered a huge flat screen in front of my oh so cute infant face...
So what's on the screen?

Movable, colored or highlighted musical score...the notes appear intensified (by whatever means)simultaneously with the sounds of the music.

Changes are...language comprises of sounds.
Changes are...
not rated yet Mar 10, 2012

Typo correction above...Changes=chances

Chances will not make the connection between music and language consciously.

Is your 'first' sound a word?

What is the first sound you hear?

(Don't stop at birth...keep going - you led a life in utero too! And you weren't deaf at the time!)

(Hint: first 'sounds' are imprinted/imparted to the brain from a cellular source within a developing embryo/fetus.)

Chances are...your research will guide you to this inescapable conclusion.
not rated yet Mar 10, 2012
Kudos to the research and researchers.
What is the origin of your surprise?

Your first association when you first heard the sound:

Let's hope so.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.