Post-radical cystectomy discharge patterns described

Post-Radical cystectomy discharge patterns described

(HealthDay) -- In the past decade there has been a decrease in prolonged length of stay following radical cystectomy in the United States, while rates of transfer to a facility have remained stable, with insurance status and the surgical institution affecting discharge patterns, according to a study published in the April issue of The Journal of Urology.

Marco Bianchi, M.D., of the Urologic Research Institute in Milan, and colleagues studied the discharge patterns, including rates of prolonged length of stay and transfer to a facility, for 11,876 patients from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample who underwent a radical cystectomy between 1998 and 2007.

The researchers found that rates of prolonged stay decreased from 59 percent from 1998 to 2001 to 50 percent from 2005 to 2007, while transfer rates remained stable at 14 percent. and were significantly more likely to experience a prolonged hospital stay (odds ratio [OR], 1.66 and 1.17, respectively), as were patients whose procedures were conducted at hospitals with low annual caseloads (OR, 1.42). Rates of transfer were significantly higher for Medicaid and Medicare patients (OR, 2.18 and 1.54, respectively) and for those treated at low annual caseload hospitals (OR, 1.81) or nonacademic institutions (OR, 1.31).

"It is encouraging that the rates of prolonged length of stay have decreased while the rates of transfer to a facility remained stable. However, it is worrisome that individuals treated at low annual caseload centers as well as those with Medicare and Medicaid insurance experience less favorable discharge patterns," the authors write.

Explore further

After Medicare rule change, fewer facilities performed bariatric surgeries but outcomes improved

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Post-radical cystectomy discharge patterns described (2012, March 29) retrieved 11 December 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments