Guidelines for prostate screening widely ignored

April 24, 2012
A surgical team performs a robotic prostatectomey at the University of Chicago Medicine Credit: Bruce Powell for the University of Chicago Medicine

New research confirms that the controversial decision by Warren Buffet – the 81-year-old CEO of Berkshire Hathaway – to undergo a blood test screening for prostate cancer despite his age is hardly unusual. Despite recommendations in 2008 from the United States Preventive Services Task Force against testing for prostate cancer in men aged 75 years or older, almost half of men in that age group continue to get screening tests.

In 2005, before the recommendations were released, 43 percent of age 75 and above elected to take the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. In August 2008, the stated it "recommends against the service," arguing "there is moderate or high certainty the service has no net benefit or that the harms outweigh the benefits."

Survey results from 2010, however, published in the April 25, 2012, issue of JAMA, found that two years after the Task Force's recommendations were announced, the rate for that group of men had gone up slightly, to 43.9 percent. This is higher than the rates for men in their 40s (12.5 percent) or 50s (33.2 percent), who are more likely to benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. Only men aged 60 to 74 were more likely to get the screening test (51.2 percent).

"PSA screening for more than 40 percent of men 75 or older is inappropriate," said study author Scott Eggener, MD, assistant professor of surgery at the University of Chicago Medicine. "Selective screening is reasonable to consider for the healthiest men over age 75, but for the large majority of men in this age group, early detection can lead to treatment of a disease that will probably never cause a problem. A substantial proportion of men over 75 with an elevated PSA will die from something else before a prostate cancer interferes with the quality or duration of their life."

"Our data are likely an underestimate," the authors note. They worked with information from the 2005 and 2010 Cancer Control Supplements, part of the annual National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which gathers information through in-person interviews and is a representative sample of the US population. "Self-reported screening rates in the NHIS," they note, "are predominantly lower compared with medical record extraction."

The revised draft recommendations presented in October 2011 by the USPSTF are even more critical of PSA screening than the 2008 version, suggesting there was not enough evidence that PSA screening improves health outcomes to routinely recommend the test for men at any age. "Prostate-specific antigen–based screening results in small or no reduction in prostate cancer–specific mortality," the Task Force concludes. It is associated with "harms related to subsequent evaluation and treatments, some of which may be unnecessary." These draft recommendations are not finalized yet but are expected to be forthcoming soon.

Clinical practice patterns following the 2011 USPSTF recommendations "should be monitored," the study authors conclude. Even if PSA screening is discouraged in the final USPSTF recommendation, "I'm not anticipating a massive change in utilization," Eggener said, based on a general tendency for individuals and physicians to support cancer screening, evidence that fewer men are dying of since the introduction of PSA, subsequent confusion about the recommendation among the general public, and ongoing concern about the disease.

Explore further: Recommendation against PSA test goes too far: expert

Related Stories

Recommendation against PSA test goes too far: expert

October 12, 2011
(Medical Xpress) -- A draft recommendation by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force calling for an end to routine PSA testing for healthy men age 50 and older goes too far, says a prostate cancer expert at the Siteman Cancer ...

Recommended for you

Immune cells the missing ingredient in new bladder cancer treatment

July 24, 2017
New research offers a possible explanation for why a new type of cancer treatment hasn't been working as expected against bladder cancer.

Shooting the achilles heel of nervous system cancers

July 20, 2017
Virtually all cancer treatments used today also damage normal cells, causing the toxic side effects associated with cancer treatment. A cooperative research team led by researchers at Dartmouth's Norris Cotton Cancer Center ...

Molecular changes with age in normal breast tissue are linked to cancer-related changes

July 20, 2017
Several known factors are associated with a higher risk of breast cancer including increasing age, being overweight after menopause, alcohol intake, and family history. However, the underlying biologic mechanisms through ...

Immune-cell numbers predict response to combination immunotherapy in melanoma

July 20, 2017
Whether a melanoma patient will better respond to a single immunotherapy drug or two in combination depends on the abundance of certain white blood cells within their tumors, according to a new study conducted by UC San Francisco ...

Discovery could lead to better results for patients undergoing radiation

July 19, 2017
More than half of cancer patients undergo radiotherapy, in which high doses of radiation are aimed at diseased tissue to kill cancer cells. But due to a phenomenon known as radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE), in which ...

How CD44s gives brain cancer a survival advantage

July 19, 2017
Understanding the mechanisms that give cancer cells the ability to survive and grow opens the possibility of developing improved treatments to control or cure the disease. In the case of glioblastoma multiforme, the deadliest ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Apr 24, 2012
"early detection can lead to treatment of a disease that will probably never cause a problem"

This is not an issue about whether to give the test or not then, it's about whether to give the follow-up treatment if disease is found. Which is under the control of the doctors.
There's no reason to stick your head in the sand and pretend the disease isn't there if it is. It's always better to be informed about your health, regardless of what you do about it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.