Olympians live longer than general population... But cyclists no survival advantage over golfers

December 13, 2012

Olympic medallists live longer than the general population, regardless of country of origin, medal won, or type of sport played, finds a study in the Christmas issue published on BMJ today.

A second study comparing athletes who trained at different physical intensities, found that those from high or sports have no added over athletes from low intensity sports. But those who engage in disciplines with high levels of physical contact, such as boxing, rugby and ice hockey, are at an increased risk of death in later life, the data show.

An accompanying editorial adds that everyone could enjoy the "" of by just meeting physical activity guidelines.

In the first study, researchers compared life expectancy among 15,174 Olympic athletes who won medals between 1896 and 2010 with general matched by country, sex, and age.

All medallists lived an average of 2.8 years longer – a significant survival advantage over the general population in eight out of the nine country groups studied.

Gold, silver and bronze medallists enjoyed roughly the same survival advantage, as did medallists in both endurance and mixed sports. Medallists in power sports had a smaller, but still significant, advantage over the general population.

The authors say that, although their study was not designed to determine why Olympic athletes live longer, "possible explanations include genetic factors, physical activity, , and the wealth and status that come from international sporting glory."

In the second study, researchers measured the effect of high on mortality later in life among former .

They tracked 9,889 athletes with a known age at death, who took part in at least one between 1896 and 1936. Together they represented 43 disciplines requiring different levels of exercise intensity and physical contact.

After adjusting for sex, year of birth and nationality, they found that athletes from sports with high cardiovascular intensity (such as cycling and rowing) or moderate cardiovascular intensity (such as gymnastics and tennis) had similar mortality rates compared with athletes from low cardiovascular intensity sports, such as golf or cricket.

However, the researchers did find an 11% increased risk of mortality among athletes from disciplines with a high risk of body collision and with high levels of physical contact, such as boxing, rugby and ice hockey, compared with other athletes. They suggest this reflects the impact of repeated collisions and injuries over time.

In an accompanying editorial, two public health experts point out that people who do at least 150 minutes a week of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity also have a survival advantage compared with the inactive general population. Estimates range from just under a year to several years.

But they argue that, compared with the successes that have been achieved in tobacco control, "our inability to improve physical activity is a public health failure, and it is not yet taken seriously enough by many in government and in the medical establishment."

"Although the evidence points to a small survival effect of being an Olympian, careful reflection suggests that similar health benefits and longevity could be achieved by all of us through regular physical activity. We could and should all award ourselves that personal gold medal," they conclude.

Explore further: Asthma is the most common chronic disease among Olympic athletes

Related Stories

Painful legacy of teen sports

July 19, 2011

Vigorous sports activities, like basketball, during childhood and adolescence can cause abnormal development of the femur in young athletes, resulting in a deformed hip with reduced rotation and pain during movement. This ...

Recommended for you

Exercise and vitamin D better together for heart health

April 27, 2017

Johns Hopkins researchers report that an analysis of survey responses and health records of more than 10,000 American adults for nearly 20 years suggests a "synergistic" link between exercise and good vitamin D levels in ...

'Diet' products can make you fat, study shows

April 25, 2017

High-fat foods are often the primary target when fighting obesity, but sugar-laden "diet" foods could be contributing to unwanted weight gain as well, according to a new study from the University of Georgia.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Dec 13, 2012
Don't forget to subtract off all the time they spend exercising. 2.8 extra years of exhausting physical exertion, yes that sounds like fun...
1 / 5 (1) Dec 14, 2012
Exercise kills senescent cells which accumulate in the body. Physical activity is taxing on the body, as a coping mechanism to the physical stress the body destroys the cells which serve no purpose. This brings down the ratio of functional mass to total mass. Your body keeps the healthy strong functional cells and gets rid of everything else it doesn't need.

Many studies also show that exercise is an effective cancer therapy, some studies even claim exercise to be a superior therapy to radiative and chemical therapies as the exercise strengthens the functional cells and targets the mutated regions while the chemical and radiative therapies affect all cells (both cancerous and non).

Bottom line, exercise not only keeps us healthy but is also an effective therapeutic tool at times when our health is not optimal.
1 / 5 (1) Dec 14, 2012
The key is to not push past boundaries. Exercise is good for longevity when applied conservatively. Rowing and cycling at competitive levels are known to damage heart tissue which leads to scarring which inhibits proper function. If exercising for health reasons you should stay as close to the limits as possible while taking care not to cause trauma. Do not push the body past the breaking point or you're doing more bad than good. The key, as with everything, is moderation. Don't do so little that you don't get the full benefits, and don't do so much that you damage yourself in the process.
not rated yet Dec 16, 2012
Rowing and cycling at competitive levels are known to damage heart tissue which leads to scarring which inhibits proper function.

In as much as such claimed damage reduces lifetime, the article doesn't support this contention at all. Perhaps you could cite something?
1 / 5 (1) Dec 16, 2012

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.