Inserting breathing tube may not be best for victims of cardiac arrest

January 15, 2013 by Barbara Bronson Gray, Healthday Reporter
Inserting breathing tube may not be best for victims of cardiac arrest
Patients in large study seemed to do better when emergency workers used older ventilation method.

(HealthDay)—When a person's heart stops beating, most emergency personnel have been taught to first insert a breathing tube through the victim's mouth, but a new Japanese study found that approach may actually lower the chances of survival and lead to worse neurological outcomes.

have long been taught the A-B-C method, focusing first on the and breathing and then circulation, through hand compressions on the chest, explained Dr. Donald Yealy, chair of at the University of Pittsburgh and co-author of an editorial accompanying the study.

But it may be more important to first restore circulation and get the blood moving through the body, he said. "We're not saying the airway isn't important, but rather that securing the airway should happen after succeeding in restoring the pulse," he explained.

The study compared cases of in which a breathing tube was inserted—considered advanced airway management—to cases using conventional bag-valve-mask ventilation.

There are a number of reasons why the use of a breathing tube in cardiac arrest may reduce effectiveness and even the odds of survival. "Every time you stop chest compressions, you start at zero building a wave of [getting the blood to circulate]. You're on a clock, and there are only so many hands in the field," Yealy said.

Study author Dr. Kohei Hasegawa, a in surgery at Harvard Medical School, gave another reason to prioritize over airway restoration.

Because many don't get the chance to place breathing tubes more than once or twice a year, he said, "it's difficult to get practice, so the chances you're doing intubation successfully are very small."

Hasegawa also noted that it's especially difficult to insert a in the field, such as in someone's living room or out on the street.

Yealy said that inserting what is called an "" or a "supraglottic [over-the-tongue] airway" in people who have a cardiac arrest out of the hospital has been standard practice since the 1970s. But recent studies have suggested that it may not be helping people survive and could even be responsible for serious mental disabilities in survivors.

That spurred Japanese researchers to undertake a large-scale study, expanding and testing the research that had previously been done, Hasegawa said. Their findings are published in the Jan. 16 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The researchers had emergency service personnel working throughout Japan report every case of cardiac arrest and note related data—such as age and sex of each patient, the cause of the cardiac arrest, the technique of airway management used and outcomes—over six years.

Almost 650,000 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were documented. The researchers analyzed the data to see what factors were associated with a favorable neurological outcome, ranging from good mental performance to moderate disability and severe cerebral disability to vegetative state and death. They also wanted to see what methods appeared to be more or less successful in getting the heart to restart before arrival at the hospital, and achieving one-month survival.

The researchers found that using any type of advanced airway management—such as endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway—was associated with decreased odds of having a favorable neurological outcome. Those patients who were treated with only the less advanced bag-valve-mask ventilation tended to do better.

However, the study did not establish a cause-and-effect relationship between airway management method and survival and neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest.

Both Yealy and Hasegawa agree that despite the size of this study, it is too soon to recommend a change in practice. "This very basic question of how to best resuscitate a person with cardiac arrest, we can't even answer," said Yealy.

Emergency medical services staff must use the scientific process to learn more about what works and what doesn't, Yealy explained. "We can't tell you the best way yet."

Explore further: Cardiac arrest treatment study exceeds paramedic recruitment targets

More information: To learn more about CPR, see the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Related Stories

Cardiac arrest treatment study exceeds paramedic recruitment targets

February 21, 2012
A pilot study by emergency care experts at UWE Bristol to test the best method of airway management to resuscitate out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients has exceeded target recruitment of paramedics from Great Western ...

9-1-1 dispatchers can save more lives by coaching bystanders in CPR

January 9, 2012
More people will survive sudden cardiac arrest when 9-1-1 dispatchers help bystanders assess victims and begin CPR immediately, according to a new American Heart Association scientific statement published in Circulation: ...

Recommended for you

Could aggressive blood pressure treatments lead to kidney damage?

July 18, 2017
Aggressive combination treatments for high blood pressure that are intended to protect the kidneys may actually be damaging the organs, new research from the University of Virginia School of Medicine suggests.

Quantifying effectiveness of treatment for irregular heartbeat

July 17, 2017
In a small proof-of-concept study, researchers at Johns Hopkins report a complex mathematical method to measure electrical communications within the heart can successfully predict the effectiveness of catheter ablation, the ...

Concerns over side effects of statins stopping stroke survivors taking medication

July 17, 2017
Negative media coverage of the side effects associated with taking statins, and patients' own experiences of taking the drugs, are among the reasons cited by stroke survivors and their carers for stopping taking potentially ...

Study discovers anticoagulant drugs are being prescribed against safety advice

July 17, 2017
A study by researchers at the University of Birmingham has shown that GPs are prescribing anticoagulants to patients with an irregular heartbeat against official safety advice.

Protein may protect against heart attack

July 14, 2017
DDK3 could be used as a new therapy to stop the build-up of fatty material inside the arteries

Heart study finds faulty link between biomarkers and clinical outcomes

July 14, 2017
Surrogate endpoints (biomarkers), which are routinely used in clinical research to test new drugs, should not be trusted as the ultimate measure to approve new health interventions in cardiovascular medicine, according to ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tkjtkj
not rated yet Jan 15, 2013
Bravo!!! As a retired Anesthesiologist I concur that the enormous stresses induced by endotracheal intubation in a non-anesthetised patient can have very undesireable cardiovascular consequences!! On the other hand, so can aspiration, if the patient is semi-conscious or more depressed ...
If the patient is awake and caN be ventilated judiciously, then i see no reason to intubate 'by protocol' . Presumably, the patient iS already on 100% O2 and the EMT's do, these days, carry O2-Sat sensors .. so decisions might not be all that difficult to make even in the heated and adrenaline-doused situation of arriving at a scene of presumed Cardiac Arrest.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.