Bariatric surgery complications rates following restricting coverage to higher-quality centers

February 26, 2013

In an analysis of data on patients who underwent bariatric surgery 2004-2009, there was no significant difference in the rates of complications and reoperation for Medicare patients before vs. after a 2006 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy that restricted coverage of bariatric surgery to centers of excellence, according to a study appearing in the February 27 issue of JAMA.

"Prompted by concerns about perioperative safety with , the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a national coverage decision in 2006 that limited coverage of weight loss surgery to centers of excellence (COEs)," according to background information in the article. These COEs were accredited by a surgical professional organization. "In addition to other structural measures and processes of care, the accreditation was based on a hospital volume threshold (>125 cases/year). Whether the CMS restriction of bariatric surgery to COEs is associated with improved outcomes remains uncertain."

Justin B. Dimick, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and colleagues compared outcomes in Medicare patients before and after implementation of the CMS policy to determine whether the policy was associated with improved outcomes (rate of complications, reoperations). The study included 2004-2009 hospital discharge data from 12 states (n = 321,464 patients) and analyzed changes in outcomes in Medicare patients undergoing bariatric surgery (n = 6,723 before and n = 15,854 after implementation of the policy). A difference-in-differences analytic approach was used to evaluate whether the national coverage decision was associated with improved outcomes in Medicare patients above and beyond existing time trends in non-Medicare patients (n = 95,558 before and n = 155,117 after implementation of the policy).

The researchers found that bariatric surgery outcomes improved during the study period in both Medicare and non-Medicare patients; however, this change was already underway prior to the CMS coverage decision. "After accounting for patient factors, changes in procedure type and pre-existing trends toward improved outcomes, there were no measurable improvements in outcomes after (vs. before) implementation of the CMS national coverage decision for any complication (8.0 percent after vs. 7.0 percent before the policy), serious complications (3.3 percent vs. 3.6 percent), and reoperation (1.0 percent vs. 1.1 percent)."

In a direct comparison of outcomes at COEs (n = 179) vs. non-COEs (n = 519), COEs did not result in better outcomes than non-COEs. "After accounting for patient factors, procedure type, and the year of operation, patients undergoing bariatric surgery at hospitals with the COE designation (vs. hospitals without the COE designation) did not have significantly different rates for any complication (5.5 percent vs. 6.0 percent), serious complications (2.2 percent vs. 2.5 percent), and reoperation (0.83 percent vs. 0.96 percent)."

Also, the authors found no relationship between hospital COE designation and adverse outcomes in a sensitivity analysis that evaluated and non- separately.

"Rather than the CMS policy restricting bariatric surgery to COEs, we found that the improvement in outcomes over time could be explained in part by the evolution away from higher risk toward lower risk procedures," the researchers note. They add that procedure mix changed in 2 important ways: first, there was a general shift away from open to laparoscopic surgery, which is consistent with broader trends in surgery toward less invasive procedures with more favorable safety profiles; and second, there was a dramatic increase in the use of laparoscopic gastric banding, a safer but less effective procedure.

The authors write that the "CMS policy restricting coverage to COEs has not been associated with improved outcomes for bariatric surgery, but may have had the unintended consequence of reducing access to care [because of potentially increased travel distance to undergo the procedure]. These findings suggest that the CMS should reevaluate this policy."

In an accompanying editorial, Caprice C. Greenberg, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, writes that because of the results of studies such as Dimick et al, the CMS is currently re-evaluating the need for bariatric surgery COEs.

Dr. Greenberg notes that COE accreditation relies on measures of structure and processes of care that duplicate accreditation functions of the Joint Commission. Measuring outcomes is difficult when relying on manual collection of information, delaying interventions when there is a need for improvement.

"As the CMS and the surgical societies re-examine the COE policy in bariatric , there is an opportunity for them to be creative; to catapult surgical outcomes science forward through scalable approaches to data sharing, measurement, collaborative networks, and CER; and to design a program that can not only identify high-quality hospitals, but also provide a sustained mechanism for quality improvement."

Explore further: Minimally invasive approach to weight-loss surgery reduces complications, study shows

More information: JAMA. 2013;309(8):792-799; JAMA. 2013;309(8):827-828.

Related Stories

Minimally invasive approach to weight-loss surgery reduces complications, study shows

June 18, 2012
A study by researchers at Stanford University Medical Center has found that a popular weight-loss operation is safer and reduces hospital bills when done with minimally invasive techniques rather than open surgery, which ...

Recommended for you

World's first child hand transplant a 'success'

July 19, 2017
The first child in the world to undergo a double hand transplant is now able to write, feed and dress himself, doctors said Tuesday, declaring the ground-breaking operation a success after 18 months.

Knee surgery—have we been doing it wrong?

July 18, 2017
A team of University at Buffalo medical doctors have published a study that challenges a surgical practice used for decades during arthroscopic knee surgery.

New tools help surgeons find liver tumors, not nick blood vessels

July 17, 2017
The liver is a particularly squishy, slippery organ, prone to shifting both deadly tumors and life-preserving blood vessels by inches between the time they're discovered on a CT scan and when the patient is lying on an operating ...

Researchers discover indicator of lung transplant rejection

July 13, 2017
Research by scientists at Dignity Health St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center's Norton Thoracic Institute was published in the July 12, 2017 issue of Science Translational Medicine titled "Zbtb7a induction in alveolar ...

New device could make closing surgical incisions a cinch

July 7, 2017
Like many surgeons, Dr. Jason Spector is often faced with the challenge of securely closing the abdominal wall without injuring the intestines. If the process goes awry, there can be serious consequences for patients, including ...

Success with first 20 patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatic transplant surgery

June 29, 2017
Surgeons at Johns Hopkins Medicine report that their first series of a minimally invasive procedure to treat chronic pancreas disease, known as severe pancreatitis, resulted in shorter hospital stays, less need for opioids ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.