Feelings of power can diffuse effects of negative stereotypes, study says

April 10, 2013, Indiana University

(Medical Xpress)—New research from social psychologists at Indiana University Bloomington suggests that feeling powerful might protect against the debilitating effects of negative stereotypes.

"If you can make women feel powerful, then maybe you can protect them from the of stereotype threat," IU social psychologist Katie Van Loo said.

In new work, Van Loo and Robert Rydell, in the Department of Psychological and in the IU College of Arts and Sciences, brought the study of these two social forces—power and stereotypes—together to determine whether one could circumvent the debilitating impact of the other.

, according to an already large body of research, have insidious effects. The very fear of confirming a stereotype that reflects on one's identity—that "women can't do math," for example—is enough to undermine a woman's performance in the subject. Social psychologists have labeled this "stereotype threat" and have documented its impact in such areas as test taking and athletics.

At the other end of the scale are the equal and opposite effects of power. Power, it has been shown, can have positive effects on individual agency, imparting a sense of freedom and control over one's cognitive, psychological and physical resources and, perhaps, paving the way for .

"This paper looks at whether making women feel powerful and reminding them of a time in which they had power can prevent stereotype threat," Van Loo said. "I wanted to look at how high power can protect women from decreases in cognitive resources as a result of stereotype threat."

In a series of three experiments, Van Loo and Rydell built a case for this process. In the first, using a technique called semantic priming, participants were given scrambled of five words, each one containing a word related to either high or low power ("dominant" and "controlling" vs. "subordinate" and "dependent"), which they would form into a sentence. Each group was then given a math test in which the instructions either invoked the negative stereotype about women and math or were gender neutral.

A second experiment used an essay-writing task to make the participants feel either high or low in power, calling upon them to recall an incident in which they had control over another person or people or another had control over them. A control group, neutral in power, enabled the researchers to gauge whether the low power diminished performance or high power boosted performance in contrast to the neutral condition of power. Members of each group then took the math test with either threat or no-threat instructions.

The third experiment examined one possible mechanism involved in this cognitive process: working memory capacity, "that aspect of memory, critical to math, which allows you to hold information and manipulate it in your mind," Van Loo said. Again divided into high, low and neutral power through the use of the writing task, participants were given a memorization task asking them to recall the last three letters in a series of letters presented to them. They were then given the math test as in the previous experiments.

Each instance led to the same conclusions. Feeling powerful protected participants from the deficits in working memory capacity that those without power and under stereotype threat experience. Women who felt high in power performed better in math than those in both the low power and control group, despite the stereotype threat instructions.

"It's not that power made them better at math," Van Loo said, "but it buffered them from the effect of the negative stereotype. When women feel powerful, they can demonstrate their ability relatively unimpeded by stereotype threat."

As the researchers observe in the study, these results highlight the pitfalls of using performance to evaluate the abilities of those belonging to negatively stereotyped groups without taking into consideration other environmental factors that may influence performance, such as stereotype threat and power.

As for the practical lessons to be taken from this study, Van Loo said, "It's a little preliminary, but the reason we did this is to try to get to the point where we could make a recommendation and show something that can be helpful."

"Maybe if you're a student and you're about to take a , try doing a thought exercise before you take a test," she said. "It might be helpful to think about a time when you had power. Maybe that would protect you."

The paper, "On the Experience of Feeling Powerful: Perceived Power Moderates the Effect of on Women's Math Performance," was published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Van Loo is a graduate student in the IU Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences. Rydell is an assistant professor in the department and director of the Social Cognition Lab.

Explore further: 'Women worse at math than men' explanation scientifically incorrect, researchers say

Related Stories

'Women worse at math than men' explanation scientifically incorrect, researchers say

January 18, 2012
A University of Missouri researcher and his colleague have conducted a review that casts doubt on the accuracy of a popular theory that attempted to explain why there are more men than women in top levels of mathematic fields. ...

How psychological cues can limit black students' academic learning, success

July 12, 2011
(PhysOrg.com) -- Like a gnawing stomach or pesky runny nose, a looming stereotype can make it difficult to focus and perform well in school. Based on existing research, black students, Latinos, and women in math and science ...

Recommended for you

Study listens in on speech development in early childhood

January 15, 2018
If you've ever listened in on two toddlers at play, you might have wondered how much of their babbling might get lost in translation. A new study from the University of Toronto provides surprising insights into how much children ...

Study suggests people dislike you more for humblebragging than for regular boasting

January 12, 2018
A team of researchers from Harvard University and UNC-Chapel Hill has conducted a study regarding humblebragging—in which a person boasts about an achievement but tries to make it sound less boastful by minimizing it—and ...

Can writing your 'to-do's' help you to doze? Study suggests jotting down tasks can speed the trip to dreamland

January 11, 2018
Writing a "to-do" list at bedtime may aid in falling asleep, according to a Baylor University study. Research compared sleep patterns of participants who took five minutes to write down upcoming duties versus participants ...

Study identifies brain circuit controlling social behavior

January 11, 2018
A new study by researchers at Roche in Basel, Switzerland has identified a key brain region of the neural circuit that controls social behavior. Increasing the activity of this region, called the habenula, led to social problems ...

Tamper-resistant oxycodone tablets have no impact on overall opioid use

January 11, 2018
The introduction of tamper-resistant opioid tablets does not have an effect on rates of opioid use or harms at a population level, according to a new study led by the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC) at UNSW ...

Suicides by drugs in U.S. are undercounted, new study suggests

January 11, 2018
The rate of suicides by drug intoxication in the United States may be vastly underreported and misclassified, according to a new study co-written by Mark Kaplan, professor of social welfare at the UCLA Luskin School of Public ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.