Researcher digs into the contested peanut-allergy epidemic

July 25, 2013, Princeton University
Credit: Princeton University

he path of the peanut from a snack staple to the object of bans at schools, day care centers and beyond offers important insights into how and why a rare, life-threatening food allergy can prompt far-reaching societal change, according to a Princeton University researcher.

Before 1980, peanut allergies were rarely mentioned in medical literature or the media, said Miranda Waggoner, a postdoctoral researcher at the Office of Population Research in the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Her article on the subject, "Parsing the peanut panic: The social life of a contested epidemic," was published recently in the journal Social Science & Medicine.

Starting around 1990, articles in medical journals began discussing the seriousness of peanut allergies, Waggoner said. At the same time, advocacy groups were emerging to raise awareness of the issue. By the mid-1990s, newspapers were printing articles with headlines such as "Nut Allergy Girl's Terror; Girl Almost Dies from Peanut Allergy."

And the 21st century brought descriptions of peanut allergies—in medical journals and the media—as an epidemic.

For those with a , ingesting the legume can lead to anaphylactic shock and, if untreated, death. But the allergy is quite rare and it isn't clear whether it is becoming more common, Waggoner said.

The increased focus on peanut allergies in the medical community, the media and society in general combined to push changes like peanut bans in schools, Waggoner said.

"All of this was happening at about the same time to produce this big societal problem that is based on what is a small problem in terms of the population affected," Waggoner said. "One physician has written that the same number of people die each year from peanut allergies as from lightning strikes, yet the perception of peanut allergy risk has invaded the common social spaces we all inhabit—airlines, day cares and schools."

In 2002, Massachusetts became the first state to enact guidelines for the management of food allergies in schools, calling for "peanut-free" tables in the lunchroom under some circumstances. Many schools and day care centers have banned peanuts, and some baseball parks now offer peanut-free zones.

"This was part of a broader concern about food risks, changing perceptions of food production, as well as changes in the way we think about child risk," Waggoner said. "If you ask adults about peanut allergies when they were in school, most of them will say it wasn't an issue. Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches were a , healthy . It's the classic American kid snack.

"The fact that this sort of mundane food is under attack is really a potent moment for us as a society."

Several factors make it difficult to assess the prevalence of peanut allergies or whether the problem is becoming more common, Waggoner said. Before the 1990s, little data were collected on peanut allergies. And peanut allergy numbers are generally based on self-reporting, which leaves them open to interpretation and influence by increased media attention.

"There's definitely increased awareness about it," Waggoner said. "There's more medical research being done. There's more medical awareness, but what is contested is the prevalence, because it is based on self-reporting. We don't have a good sense of long-term change over time."

Experts now say about 1 percent of the American population has a reported peanut allergy, Waggoner said.

Another unknown is the cause of peanut allergies, Waggoner said, adding that researchers are using genetic and molecular testing in the search for a cause.

Peter Conrad, a medical sociologist at Brandeis University who is an expert on the medicalization of society, said Waggoner's research offers important insights into the evolution of peanut allergies as a public problem.

"This paper helps us understand how a relatively rare disorder, peanut allergies, has become seen as a public risk and even as a childhood epidemic," Conrad said. "While the individual risk is high, the risk on a population level is small.

"Sometimes the public's response to a disorder may significantly outpace the actual public health risk potential. Papers like this help us understand how the sociological nature of the disorder may well shape the public response more than its medical and epidemiological nature."

Along with continuing medical research into the causes and prevalence of peanut allergies, Waggoner said another important area for future research is why it is the peanut allergy that has sparked this level of public interest and resulting changes in society.

"While eight foods account for over 90 percent of food allergy reactions, including milk, eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, fish, shellfish, soy and wheat, the peanut allergy has arguably received the largest share of medical and social attention," Waggoner writes in the paper.

Among the possible explanations: the severity of allergic reactions to peanuts and the harmful potential of such a mundane food, Waggoner said.

Explore further: Socioeconomic status linked to childhood peanut allergy

Related Stories

Socioeconomic status linked to childhood peanut allergy

November 9, 2012
Peanut allergies are rising among American children and one reason might be due to economic status. According to a new study presented at the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) Annual Scientific Meeting, ...

Pioneering study to investigate factors affecting how much peanut is safe to eat

June 5, 2013
(Medical Xpress)—A new study has begun which will, for the first time, identify how factors like exercise and stress may change how much peanut can cause an allergic reaction in the UK population.

New food allergy model for fenugreek developed

December 14, 2011
A mouse model to investigate allergy to fenugreek has been developed by Norwegian researchers. The model can also be used to study cross-reactivity to peanut, soy and lupin, major food allergens with public health relevance.

The Medical Minute: Food allergies -- testing and diagnosis

May 9, 2012
A peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Milk and cookies. Comfort food, or food to fear?

Recommended for you

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

Teens likely to crave junk food after watching TV ads

January 15, 2018
Teenagers who watch more than three hours of commercial TV a day are more likely to eat hundreds of extra junk food snacks, according to a report by Cancer Research UK.

Can muesli help against arthritis?

January 15, 2018
It is well known that healthy eating increases a general sense of wellbeing. Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) have now discovered that a fibre-rich diet can have a positive influence ...

Your dishwasher is not as sterile as you think

January 13, 2018
(HealthDay)—Your dishwasher may get those plates spotless, but it is also probably teeming with bacteria and fungus, a new study suggests.

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bannuts
1 / 5 (5) Jul 26, 2013
My son's third grade class last year included 90 students. Fully ten of them have nut allergies, including my child. We live in a town of 7,500 people in New England.

Of those ten students, 8 of them have had reactions strong enough to warrant a visit to the ER. The other 2, including my child, managed to resolve their reactions via Benadryl at home. In my son's case, is blood labs have come back higher for all his food allergies, including peanut, all the tree nuts, and egg. This past fall he had a non-life-threatening reaction to blue cheese as well as to kiwi. Another child in his group has developed meaningful reactions to coconut (another food that is claimed to be a rare allergy). Several react to sesame. These are kids I know well, whose parents are affluent and very well educated and tend not to trend with the sheep. Your research parameters are wrong, madame, and you are doing a significant disservice via quasi-scientific arrogance.
bannuts
1 / 5 (4) Jul 26, 2013
My son's third grade class last year included 90 students. Fully ten of them have nut allergies, including my child. We live in a town of 7,500 people in New England.

Of those ten students, 8 of them have had reactions strong enough to warrant a visit to the ER. The other 2, including my child, managed to resolve their reactions via Benadryl at home. In my son's case, is blood labs have come back higher for all his food allergies, including peanut, all the tree nuts, and egg. This past fall he had a non-life-threatening reaction to blue cheese as well as to kiwi. Another child in his group has developed meaningful reactions to coconut (another food that is claimed to be a rare allergy). Several react to sesame, etc.. These are kids I know well, whose parents are affluent and very well educated and tend not to trend with the sheep. Your research parameters are wrong, madame, and you are doing a significant disservice via quasi-scientific arrogance.
bertibus
1.8 / 5 (5) Jul 26, 2013
Yes, surprisingly, almost all kids with virulent food allergies come from 'affluent, well-educated' families.....who never, ever 'trend' with the sheep.
The only problem with this statement is that the definition of 'sheep' is open to debate.
A growing body of evidence suggests that affluent parents' obsessive protection of their babies / infants / toddlers is almost certainly preventing them (the kids) from developing normal, healthy immune systems as they grow.
My generation of kids used to eat dirt when we were toddlers; I have no idea how we all survived....
bannuts
1 / 5 (5) Jul 26, 2013
My son's third grade class last year included 90 students. Fully ten of them have nut allergies, including my child. We live in a town of 7,500 people in New England.

Of those ten students, 8 of them have had reactions strong enough to warrant a visit to the ER. The other 2, including my child, managed to resolve their reactions via Benadryl at home. In my son's case, is blood labs have come back higher for all his food allergies, including peanut, all the tree nuts, and egg. This past fall he had a non-life-threatening reaction to blue cheese as well as to kiwi. Another child in his group has developed meaningful reactions to coconut (another food that is claimed to be a rare allergy). Several react to sesame, etc.. These are kids I know well, whose parents are affluent and very well educated and tend not to trend with the sheep. Your research parameters are wrong, madame, and you are doing a significant disservice via quasi-scientific arrogance.
julianpenrod
1 / 5 (5) Jul 26, 2013
The fraud who called herself "Nayirah" said Iraqi soldiers took newborns from incubators in Kuwaiti hospitals and dropped them on the floor to die, then stole the incubators. It was obvious even then that no soldier on an acquisition mission would do that, if only because that would increase the likelihood of their tripping.
It was obvious there were no banned weapons systems Iraq because the mere presence of technology like that would be reflected in the infrastructure, and it was not.
"Nutritionists" tried to say eggs were dangerous. But an egg is the sole nutrition necessary to develop an unborn chick. If something like an egg could be so vital for a chick, how could it be dangerous for a human who weights 1000 times more?
julianpenrod
1 / 5 (5) Jul 26, 2013
Windmills were touted as an answer to all energy problems. But, in taking energy from wind, windmills reduce the strength of the wind. And wind is crucial for distributing dust, moving seeds, keeping birds aloft and equalizing air temperatures. Windmills can cause more damage to the environment than even fossil fuels.
DNA exploded on the scene as an answer to all crime. Now, it's admitted that, of all the millions of genetic markers in a human, they only look at 11, and the "analysis" they use to establish the likelihood that more than one person has a particular profile is severely flawed and illegitimate.
julianpenrod
1 / 5 (5) Jul 26, 2013
Many were suspicious of the exploding of "peanut allergy" and people who never had a problem a couple of months before suddenly describing themselves as "in deadly danger from peanuts". Now, it's admitted that a combination of unnaturally emphatic advertising of the condition, along with what may be a proclivity toward hypochondria among the dullards, who have also exploded in number, breeding a mass delusion!
The legitimacy of claims of autism even existing must be examined.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.