Is it possible to have Internet addiction?

November 18, 2013 by Ronald Pies Md
Is it possible to have Internet addiction?
There is little doubt that some people do spend enormous amounts of time and energy engaged in online activities—in some cases to the clear detriment of their work, family and social life. Credit: iStock

Is there really such a disorder as "Internet addiction"? In my estimation, the short, honest answer is, "We don't know enough to say for sure." Part of the problem is the ambiguity in—and disagreement over—the terms "addicted" and "addiction." An even more serious problem is sorting out the role of "the Internet" (and other electronic media) from the role of underlying emotional problems or psychiatric disorders that may better explain the so-called addictive behavior.

The new and controversial manual of —the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM-5—does not recognize any disorder called "Internet addiction." However, DSM-5 does describe "Internet gaming disorder" as a condition that requires "further study" before becoming an official diagnosis.

The DSM-5 is a bit evasive when it comes to defining the term "addiction." It notes that the term is in common usage, and typically applies to "more extreme" forms of "relapsing, compulsive drug taking." But the actual term "addiction" is not a part of the DSM-5's diagnostic criteria, owing to "its uncertain definition and potentially negative connotation."

For the most part, the DSM-5 does not buy into the concept of so-called "behavioral addictions"—"exercise addiction," "sex addiction" or "shopping addiction"—owing to the lack of credible evidence that these are bona fide mental disorders. The only exception is the DSM-5 category of gambling disorder, for which we have fairly good clinical, epidemiological and genetic evidence; for example, gambling problems are more frequent in identical twins than in fraternal twins, suggesting an inherited component.

All these qualms and complexities aside, there is little doubt that some people do spend enormous amounts of time and energy engaged in online activities—in some cases to the clear detriment of their work, family and social life. There is some evidence that, when deprived of online access, these persons may experience unpleasant withdrawal-like effects, such as anxiety or low mood. (These effects, however, are nowhere near as severe or life-threatening as withdrawal from, say, alcohol or barbiturates.) There are even anecdotal reports of people dying from blood clots or dehydration after "binging" on Internet video games for two or three days straight, without getting out of the chair.

There is no debate that these individuals have a serious behavioral problem that requires professional help. But is this true "addiction," akin to, say, addiction to opiate drugs? And if so, does it represent a specific "Internet addiction"? Or do these individuals have some underlying predisposition to excessive or compulsive activities in general—a tendency that, in the absence of the Internet, would pop up as a gambling problem, or some other excessive activity that interfered with their ability to function?

We have evidence from various studies of brain activity that several different kinds of excessive or compulsive activities lead to similar changes in the dopamine-driven "reward system" of the brain. For example, Doug Hyun Han and colleagues, writing in Comparative Psychiatry, have shown that intense video gaming, substance dependence and pathologic gambling all activate similar regions of the brain. On the one hand, such findings might argue in favor of considering "Internet addiction" a bona fide, biologically based disorder. On the other hand, these brain studies might point to a single, underlying biological mechanism that simply emerges in different pathological forms, under different circumstances.

Furthermore, there is the problem of so-called comorbidity. Many individuals thought to have an "Internet addiction" also have a variety of concomitant or contributing psychiatric problems or disorders, such as schizophrenia, major depressive disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder. It seems likely that, in many cases, such well-recognized conditions may better explain the person's abnormal Internet use than a new and discrete diagnosis called "Internet addiction." However, this view may change as we investigate familial disposition, genetic patterns, biological underpinnings and response to treatment among those diagnosed with Internet . In short, we have much to learn about this diagnosis, and the proverbial jury is still out.

Explore further: Food addiction a step closer to formal diagnostic status—or not?

Related Stories

Are you addicted to the internet?

September 26, 2012

People worried about the amount of time they spend online are invited to take part in a study about internet addiction.

Recognize and treat Internet addiction

June 18, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—Do you stay up late into the night using the Internet? Are you grumpy or anxious when you cannot log on? Do you feel the need to use the Internet more and more to feel satisfied? Do you stay online longer ...

Recommended for you

Study shows there's a positive side to worrying

April 27, 2017

Worry - it does a body good. And, the mind as well. A new paper by Kate Sweeny, psychology professor at the University of California, Riverside, argues there's an upside to worrying.

Study links cannabis use in adolescence to schizophrenia

April 26, 2017

Scientists believe that schizophrenia, a disorder caused by an imbalance in the brain's chemical reactions, is triggered by a genetic interaction with environmental factors. A new Tel Aviv University study published in Human ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Nov 18, 2013
This article is misleading. There are dozens of Internet addiction studies done by medical experts using well established protocols, finding the same measurable, addiction-related brain changes seen in substance addicts. The article also ignores the public statement of the American Society of Addiction Medicine (3000+ addiction specialists, MDs and researchers), which announced that, based on 30 years of research, addiction, whether behavioral or chemical, is one disease. Addiction is one of the most studied disorders, and can even be induced in animal models. It is understood right down to the molecular level.
Finally, the article furthers the popular "spin" that the only "real" addictions are those in which withdrawal symptoms are severe. Does this mean cigarettes and cocaine are not addictive? No. Get a responsible addiction neuroscientist to write an article on this subject. It's too important to leave to spin artists.
not rated yet Nov 29, 2013
As the (unidentified) author of the article on so-called "internet addiction", I must take exception to the oversimplified comments above. First, the writer begs the question--that is,
assumes as true precisely what is in dispute--by alluding to "dozens of internet addiction studies". The question in dispute is whether there is a discrete entity called "internet addiction". Simply identifying people as having IA by a set of behavioral criteria does not prove that IA is a discrete diagnostic entity.

Secondly, addiction specialists are by no means unanimous in their view of so-called "internet addiction." For example, addiction specialist Stuart Gitlow MD observes, "…the medical term addiction should not be applied to anything other than addictive drug use and gambling." (personal communication, 11/20/08). This was the determination of the
DSM-5 authors, as well, until research on IA becomes more persuasive. Please see:
http://www.ncbi.n...2719452/ --R. Pies MD

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.