Silencers refine sound localization

May 20, 2014

A new study by LMU researchers shows that sound localization involves a complex interplay between excitatory and inhibitory signals. Pinpointing of sound sources in space would be impossible without the tuning effect of the latter.

Did that lion's growl come from the left or the right? Or are there two of them out there? In the wild, the ability to perceive is of little use unless one can also pinpoint, and discriminate between, different sound sources in space. The capacity for is equally important for spatial orientation and vocal communication in humans. The underlying mechanism is known to depend on the processing of binaural signals in bilateral nerve-centers in the brainstem, where neural computations extract is extracted from them. "Each nerve-cell in the processing center receives not only excitatory but also inhibitory signals," says LMU neurobiologist Professor Benedikt Grothe. "We have now shown how the intrinsic silencing mechanism works at the , and why it plays such a crucial role in the localization of sounds."

Sound localization depends on the fact that the "ipsilateral" ear (the one closer to the sound source) perceives the incoming sound slightly earlier than the "contralateral" ear. Since the difference in reception time may be as brief as a fraction of a millisecond, the neural integration process in the time domain must be extremely precise. It was long thought that the direction of the source was determined solely by measuring the difference in the arrival times of excitatory signals from ipsilateral and contralateral ears. But, as Grothe explains: "Comparison of the excitatory signals alone is not sufficient to permit precise discrimination between impulses that arrive only microseconds apart."

Inhibition reduces background distortion

Using a highly sophisticated experimental design, Grothe and his team were able to demonstrate that spatial information is distilled from four different inputs, namely pairs of inhibitory and excitatory signals arriving from each ear. Moreover, the researchers were able to elucidate the nature of the processing mechanism with the help of a technique known as dynamic patch clamping. With this method, one can measure intracellularly, compute their combined effect in real time, and inject the resulting signal back into the cell. "This permits us to measure and manipulate electric currents within cells. By employing this highly complex approach, we were able to characterize the effects of both inhibitory and excitatory signals at the cellular level, and investigate the impact of their integration on the ability to localize sounds," Grothe explains.

It turns out that neural inhibition controls and dynamically adjusts the time-point at which a given cell becomes maximally active. Thanks to this fine-tuning mechanism, the difference in arrival times between the right and left signals can be determined more precisely than would otherwise be possible. "This is a very dynamic process, which is utilized great precision. Above all, it allows for very rapid resetting of the relationship between the magnitudes of excitatory and inhibitory signals, which would not be feasible on the basis of only two signals," Grothe adds. How the optimal timing offset is chosen remains unclear, but Grothe hopes that future studies will shed light on this phenomenon.

Explore further: Feedback loops and localization errors

More information: "Glycinergic inhibition tunes coincidence detection in the auditory brainstem." Michael H. Myoga, et al. Nature Communications 5, Article number: 3790 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4790. Received 10 October 2013 Accepted 02 April 2014 Published 07 May 2014

Related Stories

Feedback loops and localization errors

October 24, 2013
Neurobiologists at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich describe a feedback loop that modulates the processing of auditory signals in the brainstem in a frequency-dependent manner, and can lead to systematic errors in the ...

How nerve cells flexibly adapt to acoustic signals

April 11, 2014
In order to process acoustic information with high temporal fidelity, nerve cells may flexibly adapt their mode of operation according to the situation. At low input frequencies, they generate most outgoing action potentials ...

A brain filter for clear information transmission

September 6, 2012
Every activity in the brain involves the transfer of signals between neurons. Frequently, as many as one thousand signals rain down on a single neuron simultaneously. To ensure that precise signals are delivered, the brain ...

Researchers turn current sound-localization theories 'on their ear'

December 3, 2013
The ability to localize the source of sound is important for navigating the world and for listening in noisy environments like restaurants, an action that is particularly difficult for elderly or hearing impaired people. ...

Recommended for you

New study reveals contrasts in how groups of neurons function during decision making

July 19, 2017
By training mice to perform a sound identification task in a virtual reality maze, researchers at Harvard Medical School and the Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT) have identified striking contrasts in how groups of neurons ...

Memory takes time, researchers conclude

July 19, 2017
How short-term memories become long-term ones has frequently been explored by researchers. While a definitive answer remains elusive, New York University scientists Thomas Carew and Nikolay Kukushkin conclude that this transformation ...

Researchers identify new target for chronic pain

July 19, 2017
Proteins must be in the right place at the right time in the cell to function correctly. This is even more critical in a neuron than in other cells because of its complex tree-like structure and its function. Researchers ...

Brains are more plastic than we thought

July 19, 2017
Practice might not always make perfect, but it's essential for learning a sport or a musical instrument. It's also the basis of brain training, an approach that holds potential as a non-invasive therapy to overcome disabilities ...

Healthy heart in 20s, better brain in 40s?

July 19, 2017
Folks with heart-healthy habits in their 20s tend to have larger, healthier brains in their 40s—brains that may be better prepared to withstand the ravages of aging, a new study reports.

Individual insight into brain networks

July 19, 2017
Harvard scientists have gained new insights into how the brain networks important for thought and remembering are organized in individual people, bringing the notion of using brain scans to help personalize medical treatments ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.