Study offers evidence of unconscious thinking impacting conscious decision making

brain
Credit: Rice University
(Medical Xpress)—A trio of researchers with the University of New South Wales, has found evidence to support the notion that unconscious thinking does impact conscious thinking, without the person even knowing it. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Alexandra Vlassova, Chris Donkin, and Joel Pearson describe the many experiments they conducted with volunteers and why their findings are important.

Psychologists (and others) have debated for a long time whether the conscious decisions people make are influenced by unconscious information. Does some part of our brain hold information that somehow has a backdoor to our conscious thought-making process, without our knowing it? Some prior research has suggested that might be the case—it might explain, for example, why people make seemingly illogical decisions sometimes.

To better understand what might be going on, the researchers placed a dynamic dichoptic mask on each volunteer—it allowed for showing different imagery to each eye. Volunteers were shown images of moving dots and were asked to tell the researchers which direction they were moving—left or right. The catch was that the movement was nearly imperceptible at first, only growing more apparent over time. The earlier a volunteer could identify which way the dots were moving, the more accurate their score. During some experiments, colored dots moved randomly in front of one eye, while grey dots moving either left or right were shown to the other. The colored dots overwhelmed the brain with information causing the imagery from the grey dots to be obscured. Prior research has shown that when faced with such a setup, the human brain does in fact "see" what is going on with the grey dots—but only unconsciously, the person isn't aware of it. In this new study, the researchers tested whether offering some prior information unconsciously via the two types of exposure could cause changes to the accuracy of imagery presented afterwards. They found that indeed it did—the volunteers more accurately figured out which way the grey dots were moving when they saw them beforehand while the colored dots were moving, but didn't know it. Thus, the unconscious information somehow helped improve their accuracy, which is an example, the team claims, of unconscious information impacting decision making.

Interestingly, the researchers also found that the degree of confidence in the accuracy by the volunteers wasn't changed regardless of whether they were being impacted unconsciously or not. They suggest that if similar processes are going on everyday for everyone it could have broad implications for interpreting how humans think in general.


Explore further

Ever-so-slight delay improves decision-making accuracy

More information: Unconscious information changes decision accuracy but not confidence, PNAS, Alexandra Vlassova, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403619111

Abstract
The controversial idea that information can be processed and evaluated unconsciously to change behavior has had a particularly impactful history. Here, we extend a simple model of conscious decision-making to explain both conscious and unconscious accumulation of decisional evidence. Using a novel dichoptic suppression paradigm to titrate conscious and unconscious evidence, we show that unconscious information can be accumulated over time and integrated with conscious elements presented either before or after to boost or diminish decision accuracy. The unconscious information could only be used when some conscious decision-relevant information was also present. These data are fit well by a simple diffusion model in which the rate and variability of evidence accumulation is reduced but not eliminated by the removal of conscious awareness. Surprisingly, the unconscious boost in accuracy was not accompanied by corresponding increases in confidence, suggesting that we have poor metacognition for unconscious decisional evidence.

© 2014 Medical Xpress

Citation: Study offers evidence of unconscious thinking impacting conscious decision making (2014, October 28) retrieved 24 April 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-10-evidence-unconscious-impacting-conscious-decision.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
690 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 28, 2014
I can't count how many times I've woken up in the morning and a really tough problem is solved waiting for me, or on my drive home from work, the answer just springs into my head from no where.

I think smarts is more about subconscious slave labor then conscious intelligence. Consciousness is like the helpless business owner with no real talents besides money and power. He claims he's in control but has delicious dishes served to him from the little people in the kitchen that never get the recognition. Without them, I'd certainly starve.

Oct 28, 2014
Really?
Thank goodness Jung and Freud and Bill WIlson and a few thousand others didn't discover this 100 years ago.
To the quiet mind the secrets of the universe are revealed. ----- "Zen Mondo"

Oct 28, 2014
Thinking outside the box; sleeping on it; going with your gut - folk recognition of this study's results. The most random thinker often has the the most insight because .. "the force is strong in that one."

JVK
Oct 28, 2014
Human pheromones: integrating neuroendocrinology and ethology http://www.nel.ed...view.htm

"The importance of the human sense of smell has been largely underestimated... the affect of pheromones on our emotions is linked to the effect of pheromones on the hormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis - an unconscious affect."

Comparative approaches in evolutionary psychology: molecular neuroscience meets the mind
http://nel.edu/pd...epp_.pdf

"Claims regarding evolved, uniquely human, psychological constructs should be constrained by the rigorous evidentiary standards that are routine in other sciences."

Oct 28, 2014

It's only "controversial" -- not -- because you didn't know.

Oct 29, 2014
I can't believe JVK got in a comment on this one...
When will it end for him?

JVK
Nov 01, 2014
The paper that I co-authored and published in 2001 "Human pheromones: integrating neuroendocrinology and ethology" won the same award as the paper by Panksepp et al., that won the award in 2002 for "Comparative approaches in evolutionary psychology: molecular neuroscience meets the mind"

I can't believe that you ignore the record of publications and ask
When will it end for him?
Nothing ends for me so long as others continue to present the same findings that review articles have discussed as if there was something new.

Nov 03, 2014
Mindfulness meditation which dates back to more 2500 year ago practiced by Buddhist monks, is a means of quieting the chatter of the thinking brain and amplifying the whispers of the subconscious mind. Focusing on sensations in the body and being in touch with our intuition and our gut. like @eric_doll pointed out. And also, like @travisr mentioned, while driving or while in the shower we come up with solutions to vexing problems. Dr. Herbert Benson from Harvard Medical School points out that we can attempt to get in touch with our subconscious by invoking the relaxation response by the parasympathetic nervous system. These techniques have been used to Empower people with heart disease per @DrArathiRao.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more