Racial disparity seen with congenital heart surgery

Racial disparity seen with congenital heart surgery

(HealthDay)—There are poorer medical outcomes in black and Hispanic patients undergoing surgical intervention for congenital heart disease, although mortality is not increased, according to a study published in the Dec. 1 issue of the American Journal of Cardiology.

Frank J. Raucci Jr., M.D., Ph.D., from the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, and colleagues analyzed data from the University Health-System Consortium to assess inpatient resource use by patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes representative of Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 (RACHS-1) classifications 1 through 5 and 6 from 2006 to 2012 (15,453 pediatric surgical admissions).

The researchers found that the overall mortality was 4.5 percent (689 patients). The total cost of hospitalization, hospital charges, total length of stay, length of stay, and mortality increased with increasing RACHS-1 classification. Black patients (2,034) had higher total costs ($96,884 versus $85,396 for white patients), higher charges ($318,313 versus $285,622), and longer length of stay (20.4 versus 18 days) compared with , even when controlling for RACHS-1 classification. There were similarly disparate outcomes for Hispanic patients ($104,292, $351,371, and 23 days, respectively), and they also had longer stays in the intensive care unit.

"Medical and economic measures increased predictably with increased procedure risk," the authors write.

Explore further

High mortality, costs with C. difficile after spine surgery

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Journal information: American Journal of Cardiology

Copyright © 2014 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Racial disparity seen with congenital heart surgery (2014, December 4) retrieved 22 September 2021 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-12-racial-disparity-congenital-heart-surgery.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors