Clarity needed in studies on gender and access to cardiac rehabilitation

Sex-based inequalities in life expectancy and quality due to heart disease are repeatedly described, but how gender and social structure play roles in this phenomenon are unclear. Women and men can equally benefit from secondary prevention/cardiac rehabilitation, and there is a need to understand gender barriers to uptake.

A new review of qualitative studies on the issue found that despite the abundance of social theories of gender, few papers have specified a definition or theoretical position on gender.

"Gender is frequently treated as a demographic variable or a property of an individual, not as the relational concept feminists intended it to be. Researchers then assume that men's or women's views are the result of gender, but overlook the social, material, or institutional circumstances that contextualize and shape these meanings," said Dr. Jan Angus, lead author of the Journal of Advanced Nursing review. "Without conceptual clarity about the social origins of , we miss important analytic steps."

More information: Angus J.E., King-Shier K.M., Spaling M.A., Duncan A.S., Jaglal S.B., Stone J.A. & Clark A.M. (2015) A secondary meta-synthesis of qualitative studies of gender and access to cardiac rehabilitation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12620
Journal information: Journal of Advanced Nursing

Provided by Wiley
Citation: Clarity needed in studies on gender and access to cardiac rehabilitation (2015, February 3) retrieved 10 December 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

How do men and women respond to gender bias in STEM?


Feedback to editors