Study allays concerns that cardiothoracic physicians-in-training provide suboptimal care

A conundrum in medical education is how to train residents in complex and technically difficult procedures without reducing the quality of patient care. In an analysis of prospective data from a study of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), no differences were found in short-term or one-year patient outcomes and patency of grafts between properly-supervised residents and attending surgeons. G. Hossein Almassi, MD, is presenting the results of this research at the 95th AATS Annual Meeting in Seattle, WA on April 28, 2015.

"These findings strongly support the education and training of residents who will be the future generation of cardiac surgeons," stated Dr. Almassi, a professor of cardiothoracic surgery at the Medical College of Wisconsin (Milwaukee).

This was an analysis of prospectively collected data from the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) trial, the world's first large trial that was designed to compare outcomes from standard CABG with the use of a heart-lung machine to the beating heart bypass grafting technique. Eighteen Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers took part in the study and 2203 patients were enrolled. Most of the medical centers were affiliated with academic medical schools and 16 participated in the training and education of both medical students and cardiac surgery residents.

The level of residents' training varied between postgraduate year 6 and 10 postgraduate year. The results showed that residents acted as the primary surgeon in the majority of surgeries: 77.8% (493/633) of on-pump CABG procedures and 67.4% (431/639) of off-pump procedures. This difference was statistically significant (p<.001). This corresponded to 79.2% and 67.3% of the distal coronary anastomoses in the on-pump group and off-pump groups, respectively (p=0.013). There were no differences in patient characteristics between those operated on by the residents compared to those operated on by the surgical attending physicians.

No differences between surgeon groups were found in short-term perioperative morbidity (e.g. myocardial infarction, reoperation for bleeding, stroke, new mechanical circulatory support, reintubation, prolonged ventilator support, mediastinitis or renal failure) or mortality. For example, the operative death rate was 0.9% for both residents and attendings. At one year following surgery, the rate of repeat revascularization was 4.4% for the residents and 4.3% for attendings. Rates for other major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction)) and graft patency were also similar for the two groups.

"Concerns about the outcomes of surgeries performed by physicians-in-training are heightened by the establishment of integrated thoracic surgery training programs," explained Dr. Almassi. In these six-year programs, residents do not have the surgical training afforded by the traditional four or five years of general surgery prior to beginning cardiothoracic surgery training." Nevertheless, Dr. Almassi commented that with appropriate case selection and supervision, ROOBY documents that residents performed CABG with similar outcomes to attending surgeons.

More information: "Resident versus Attending Surgeon Patency and Clinical Outcomes in On- versus Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery," 95th AATS Annual Meeting in Seattle, WA on April 28, 2015.

Provided by American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Citation: Study allays concerns that cardiothoracic physicians-in-training provide suboptimal care (2015, April 28) retrieved 24 June 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Largest study of on-pump and off-pump bypass proves both can be done safely


Feedback to editors