Is UK evaluation of reproductive tech a model for US?

April 10, 2015 by David Orenstein, Brown University
Is UK evaluation of reproductive tech a model for US?
Dr. Eli Adashi

When the United Kingdom resoundingly approved mitochondrial replacement therapy in February, it became the first country to give people this new medical option. In parallel it gave the United States serious cause to reflect on how it handles matters of reproductive innovation, argues a trio of experts in the journal Science.

"We have fundamentally different regulatory cultures," said co-author Dr. Eli Adashi, former dean of medicine and biological sciences at Brown University.

The essay's other authors are I. Glenn Cohen of Harvard law and ethicist Julian Savulescu of the University of Oxford.

MRT was conceived to prevent a particular set of health problems from continuing in a family's lineage. The mitochondria are structures within cells that help them produce the energy they need. They have their own genome, separate from the DNA in the cell's nucleus that constitutes the vast majority of the genetic code that makes us who we are. Nevertheless, flaws in mitochondrial DNA can result in certain diseases.

The idea of MRT, therefore, is to get the flawed mitochondria out of the picture when a potential child is just one cell: either an egg or an embryo. In MRT, scientists propose to transplant the nucleus of an egg or zygote into a similar cell from a donor who has healthy mitochondria. The UK is now free to investigate in clinical trials whether resulting babies will thrive, as hoped, with the natural blend of their parents' nuclear DNA, but with the mitochondria of a donor.

Different paths

In the United Kingdom, MRT underwent the evaluation of a specialized, tightly focused institution known as the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. The United Kingdom established HFEA in the wake of its experience grappling with in vitro fertilization, a procedure with scientific and ethical similarities to MRT. HFEA's process, which took about four years, ensured a thorough scientific and ethical review as well as public comment on MRT prior to Parliament's approval on Feb. 3, 2015.

The U.S. experience offers many contrasts, the authors note. Foremost is that there is no specialized body for reviewing these kinds of procedures, although the Food and Drug Administration has asserted jurisdiction over MRT via its Office of Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

"The FDA is a really broad umbrella that is non-specialized," Adashi said. "In the U.K. it's a highly specialized agency that does nothing else but look into matters of reproduction."

The relevant FDA advisory committee first met in February 2014, and then in September the FDA commissioned an ad hoc committee of the Institute of Medicine to consider the ethical and social policy implications of MRT before its proceeds any further. The IOM is not expected to report for another year.

Other differences include that the United Kingdom simply started considering MRT earlier. Reproductive technologies involving embryos are more legally constrained and ethically controversial in the United States, and although American and British scientists both contributed significantly to the development of MRT, the British in particular regard the breakthrough as a point of national pride, the authors wrote.

It's not just about MRT

Whether or whenever the United States eventually approves MRT, there are also other technologies unique to reproduction and heritability on the policy agenda, the authors noted. These include germline editing, in which scientists could hypothetically edit the nuclear DNA of a sperm, egg, or embryo, and generating eggs or sperm from stem cell-derived somatic cells. In this context of several pending reproductive technology issues, the authors argue that the United States may need to devote the same specialized regulatory resources to the questions as the United Kingdom has.

"This examination of the different approaches taken to the regulation of MRT in the U.K. and the U.S. leads us to reexamine the wisdom of burdening the FDA with the regulatory adjudication of MRT as opposed to adopting a HFEA-like paradigm," the authors wrote. Adashi said MRT in the United States is a test case that can benefit from considering the United Kingdom's successful process.

"How we handle MRT will determine how we handle future breakthrough reproductive technologies," Adashi said.

Explore further: Trio contrast approaches taken by Britain versus the US concerning mitochondrial replacement therapy

More information: Trio contrast approaches taken by Britain versus the US concerning mitochondrial replacement therapy: medicalxpress.com/news/2015-04 … n-mitochondrial.html

Related Stories

Trio contrast approaches taken by Britain versus the US concerning mitochondrial replacement therapy

April 10, 2015
(Medical Xpress)—Glenn Cohen, with Harvard University, Julian Savulescu, with the University of Oxford and Eli Adashi with Brown University have together written and published a Perspectives piece in the journal Science, ...

Science shows ethical questions remain unanswered with 3-person IVF

February 2, 2015
Diseases caused by genetic mutations in the mitochondria – the powerhouses of the cell – can be disabling, or even deadly. That is why mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT), otherwise also known as three-person IVF ...

A look at the UK's proposal to make babies from 3 people

February 3, 2015
As British lawmakers vote Tuesday on whether to legalize the creation of babies made from the DNA of three people, here are some questions and answers about the proposed techniques and the controversy surrounding them.

UK proposes rules for embryos made from 3 people

December 17, 2014
(AP)—New rules proposed in Britain would make it the first country to allow embryos to be made from the DNA of three people in order to prevent mothers from passing on potentially fatal genetic diseases to their babies.

What can magnetic resonance tractography teach us about human brain anatomy?

September 26, 2011
Magnetic resonance tractography (MRT) is a valuable, noninvasive imaging tool for studying human brain anatomy and, as MRT methods and technologies advance, has the potential to yield new and illuminating information on brain ...

Strong magnetic fields for new insights into the brain

May 13, 2011
Siemens will install three powerful, high-field magnetic resonance tomographs (MRT) at the University of Maastricht, The Netherlands, and thus provide entirely new insights into the human brain. The MRTs are to be dedicated ...

Recommended for you

Rise in preterm births linked to clinical intervention

January 18, 2018
Research at the University of Adelaide shows preterm births in South Australia have increased by 40 percent over 28 years and early intervention by medical professionals has resulted in the majority of the increase.

New report calls into question effectiveness of pregnancy anti-nausea drug

January 17, 2018
Previously unpublished information from the clinical trial that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration relied on to approve the most commonly prescribed medicine for nausea in pregnancy indicates the drug is not effective, ...

New study finds 'baby brain' is real, but the cause remains mysterious

January 15, 2018
So-called "baby brain" refers to increased forgetfulness, inattention, and mental "fogginess" reported by four out of five pregnant women. These changes in brain function during pregnancy have long been recognised in midwifery ...

Sleep quality improves with help of incontinence drug

January 12, 2018
A drug used to curtail episodes of urinary incontinence in women also improves quality of sleep, a researcher at the Stanford University School of Medicine reports.

Frozen embryos result in just as many live births in IVF

January 10, 2018
Freezing and subsequent transfer of embryos gives infertile couples just as much of a chance of having a child as using fresh embryos for in vitro fertilization (IVF), research from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and Adelaide, ...

Study suggests air pollution breathed in the months before and after conception increases chance of birth defects

January 8, 2018
A team of researchers with the University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital has found evidence that indicates that pre-and post-pregnant women living in an area with air pollution are at an increased risk of ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.