Sausages, ham cause cancer, red meat 'probably' too: agency (Update)

October 26, 2015

An uncooked rib roast. Credit: Michael C. Berch/Wikipedia
Sausages, ham and other processed meats cause bowel cancer, and red meat "probably" does too, a UN agency warned Monday, in a potentially heavy blow for the fast-growing livestock industry.

A review of 800 studies from around the world found "sufficient evidence in humans that the consumption of processed meat causes colorectal cancer," said the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

The finding, it added, supports "recommendations to limit intake of meat"—particularly in processed forms.

The category includes meat that has been salted, cured, fermented or smoked—hot dogs, sausages, corned beef, dried meat like beef jerky or South African biltong, canned meat or meat-based sauces.

For every 50 grammes (1.8 ounces) of meat eaten on a daily basis, the population-wide risk of developing colon cancer was 18 percent higher, said the agency.

This meant enlarging the group of people likely to develop bowel cancer in their lifetime from six to seven out of every 100 who eat a three-rasher bacon sandwich every single day, explained statistician David Spiegelhalter of Cambridge University, who was not involved in the study.

The IARC agreed the cancer risk was statistically "small", but "increases with the amount of meat consumed."

For unprocessed red meat—beef, veal, pork, lamb, mutton, horse or goat, the review found "strong" evidence of a link, but not convincing enough to place it in the group of confirmed cancer-causing agents which includes tobacco smoke, asbestos, and now also salami.

The agency cited research attributing about 34,000 cancer deaths per year worldwide to diets high in processed meat.

This was dwarfed by the estimated one million cancer deaths attributed to tobacco smoking, 600,000 to alcohol use, and more than 200,000 to air pollution every year, said the agency.

The IARC said its data did "not permit" the determination of a safe meat quota.

'Tortured data'

"It is not yet fully understood" how cancer risk was increased, the agency added—speculating about the potential role of chemicals that form during meat processing or cooking.

Meat producers slammed the report, as independent experts urged caution in interpreting the numbers.

Read: Should I stop eating meat? No need, experts say

The North American Meat Institute (NAMI) said the IARC "tortured the data to ensure a specific outcome".

NAMI vice president Betsy Booren pointed to the high consumption of processed meats like salami and ham as part of the Mediterranean diet, yet "people in countries where the Mediterranean diet is followed, like Spain, Italy and France, have some of the longest lifespans in the world and excellent health."

British nutrition expert Elisabeth Lund said: "Very few people in Europe eat sufficient meat to fall into the high meat consumption category," and stressed it remained a crucial source of iron and zinc.

Ian Johnson, a Britain-based nutrition researcher, added that "there is little or no evidence that vegetarians in the UK have a lower risk of bowel cancer than meat-eaters."

The IARC's cancer warning is the latest on a long list of troubles for the meat industry: from salmonella and "mad cow" scares, to dietary fat blamed for disease-causing high cholesterol and livestock methane emissions contributing to global warming.

"How many more health scares must we endure before people realise that animal protein is not good for us?" asked Jasmijn de Boo of The Vegan Society, a group that advocates against human use of animal proteins.

According to another UN agency, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), meat consumption has doubled since 1980 in developing countries, as populations and income expand, while remaining static in the rich world.

By 2050, world meat production is projected to double, says the FAO website.

The report of the IARC, based in Lyon, France, was compiled by 22 experts from 10 countries.

Explore further: Eating red and processed meat—what do scientists say

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Related Stories

Eating red and processed meat—what do scientists say

March 6, 2014
Recent reports warn about a link between eating red and processed meat and the risk of developing cancer in the gut. These reports have resulted in new nutritional recommendations that advise people to limit their intake ...

Incidences and severity of prostate cancer correlated with meat consumption: study

November 23, 2011
Increased consumption of ground beef or processed meat is positively associated with aggressive prostate cancer, according to a study published Nov. 23 in the online journal PLoS ONE.

Processed meat may increase pancreatic cancer risk

January 13, 2012
(Medical Xpress) -- Eating too much processed meat may increases the risk of pancreatic cancer, according to new research published in the British Journal of Cancer.

Processed meat linked to premature death

March 6, 2013
In a huge study of half a million men and women, research in Biomed Central's open access journal BMC Medicine demonstrates an association between processed meat and cardiovascular disease and cancer.

Recommended for you

Researchers identify a mechanism that fuels cancer cells' growth

November 14, 2018
Scientists at the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center have identified sodium glucose transporter 2, or SGLT2, as a mechanism that lung cancer cells can utilize to obtain glucose, which is key to their survival and promotes ...

A new approach to detecting cancer earlier from blood tests: study

November 14, 2018
Cancer scientists led by principal investigator Dr. Daniel De Carvalho at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre have combined "liquid biopsy", epigenetic alterations and machine learning to develop a blood test to detect and classify ...

New antibody breakthrough to lead the fight against cancer

November 14, 2018
Scientists at the University of Southampton have developed a new antibody that could hold the key to unlocking cancer's defence against the body's immune system.

Photoacoustic imaging may help doctors detect ovarian tumors earlier

November 14, 2018
Ovarian cancer claims the lives of more than 14,000 in the U.S. each year, ranking fifth among cancer deaths in women. A multidisciplinary team at Washington University in St. Louis has found an innovative way to use sound ...

Solving the mystery of NPM1 in acute myeloid leukemia

November 13, 2018
Although it has long been recognized that mutations of gene NPM1 play an important role in acute myeloid leukemia, no one has determined how the normal and the mutated forms of the protein NPM1 function.

Cognitive decline—radiation—brain tumor prevented by temporarily shutting down immune response

November 13, 2018
Treating brain tumors comes at a steep cost, especially for children. More than half of patients who endure radiation therapy for these tumors experience irreversible cognitive decline, a side-effect that has particularly ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TulsaMikel
not rated yet Oct 26, 2015
Eating keeps you alive and slowly kills you at the same time.
JamesG
1 / 5 (2) Oct 26, 2015
I don't believe anything that comes out of the UN. They have no credibility whatsoever.
DirtySquirties
not rated yet Oct 27, 2015
Oh no! It can't be! One statistical analysis shows that [insert food here] supports the hypothesis that it increases the likelihood of getting cancer! I can't believe it!
Timray
1 / 5 (1) Nov 02, 2015
i am still pondering margarine or beef.....U.N. ???? hockey sticks anyone???
Dug
3 / 5 (2) Nov 03, 2015
The new way to publish without actually doing any research is the meta analysis. Additionally, the meta analysis is only as good as the data interpreters. Like computers its garbage in GIGO.

We've known for decades of the link between nitrosamines. Eating meat in moderation itself - as human ancestors have done, as their primate relatives do - probably has little impact on longevity or disease. However, putting nitrates and who knows what else in meat concoctions and or cooking it at excessive temperatures has shown to be carcinogenic. My parents and grand parents spent their entire lives eating ham, bacon, fried everything in bacon grease and lived into their 90s. Additionally, limited current studies regarding vegan and vegetarian diets show "mild improvements primarily for men" - though "conclusive results" have yet to be demonstrated. (http://www.ncbi.n...C407313I

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.