Premature ejaculation isn't a true illness

A new review argues that premature ejaculation—which has become the center of a multimillion dollar business—should not be classified as a male sexual dysfunction. By pointing to false assumptions about premature ejaculation, as well as female sexual dysfunction, the review's authors question whether it has become an illness constructed by sexual medicine experts under the influence of drug companies.

"It is important for men to understand that in the physiology of ejaculation and orgasm is not impaired, and that it is normal in adolescent males especially during their first sexual encounters," said Dr. Vincenzo Puppo, co-author of the Clinical Anatomy article. "Teens and men can understand their sexual response during masturbation and learn ejaculatory control without drug therapy." Also, immediately after ejaculation, men enter a refractory period, which lengthens with age.

His co-author, Dr. Giulia Puppo noted that vaginal orgasm does not exist, so the duration of penile-vaginal intercourse is not important for a woman's orgasm. "In all women, orgasm is always possible if the female erectile organs are effectively stimulated during masturbation, cunnilingus, or partner masturbation, before and after male ejaculation, or during vaginal intercourse if the clitoris is simply stimulated with a finger."

More information: Vincenzo Puppo et al. Comprehensive review of the anatomy and physiology of male ejaculation: Premature ejaculation is not a disease, Clinical Anatomy (2015). DOI: 10.1002/ca.22655

Provided by Wiley
Citation: Premature ejaculation isn't a true illness (2015, November 4) retrieved 16 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-11-premature-ejaculation-isnt-true-illness.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

There's no such thing as a vaginal orgasm, review finds

17 shares

Feedback to editors