People with depression may not be getting all the information they're looking for

January 11, 2016
People seeking treatment for depression may not be getting all the information they want
Credit: Joan M. Mas

More than 15 million American adults seek treatment for depression each year. However, a first-of-its-kind study by researchers at The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice reveals an eye-opening disconnect between the priorities of patients and clinicians when it comes to the information needed to make decisions about treatment options. 

"The good news is that both and clinicians who treat depression consider whether a treatment will work to be the most important priority," said Paul Barr, an assistant professor at The Dartmouth Institute and the study's lead author. "However, while consumers place a high priority on cost and insurance information, clinicians do not always prioritize this as highly."

The study, published online by BMJ Open, surveyed close to 1,000 Americans who were currently undergoing or have previously sought treatment for depression and 250 clinicians who had recently treated patients for depression in the United States. Patients were recruited to reflect the age, gender and education level of the population of U.S. adults suffering from depression. Clinicians surveyed had an average of 15 years of professional experience and included therapists, psychiatrists and primary care physicians.  

In addition to whether a treatment would work, patients wanted to know about potential side effects, whether a treatment was covered by insurance, how long before it took effect and how much it would cost. Clinicians were asked to rank their information priorities about a potential treatment from their professional perspective as a clinician as well as to identify what they believed their patients would consider most important when making a treatment decision. 

"What we found is although many health care providers realize that their patients want to know how much a particular treatment costs and if insurance will cover it, they don't seem to cover these topics with their patients," Barr says, adding that lack of communication on these topics could be attributed to time limitations during a clinical visit, the difficulties of identifying patient-specific costs and a belief that medical decisions should be based exclusively on needs, not costs. 

Barr also noted that "the cost of treatment has a significant impact on a patient's financial stability, which can impact their well-being and whether they actually begin a treatment, especially if they cannot afford it." 

In the second part of their study, Barr and his co-authors, Rachel Forcino, Manish Mishra, Rachel Blitzer and Glyn Elwyn, also asked patient-respondents the three-question CollaboRATE survey about their most recent clinic visit where depression was discussed, including how much effort they felt was made to help them understand their health issues and how well they felt the clinician listened to what was important to them regarding their health issues and next steps. Only 18% of respondents reported a high level of perceived shared decision making with their clinician, while the majority perceived a lower level of shared decision making.  

The study's authors note that better equipping clinicians to talk to consumers about the cost and insurance coverage associated with different treatment options could lead to more "engaged and empowered consumers," which they state is of particular interest given the expansion of mental health coverage and depression screening under the Affordable Care Act. 

The research team is currently working on developing decision support intervention tools (DESIs) such as Option Grids decision aids to help increase shared decision making among people with depression that may reduce the information gap between consumers and clinicians. 

"There is a lot that could be done to help patients and health care providers communicate more effectively and to ultimately help people with get the they want," Barr said.  

Explore further: Effect of decision aid in selecting antidepressant

Related Stories

Effect of decision aid in selecting antidepressant

September 28, 2015
Use of a decision aid helped primary care clinicians and patients with moderate to severe depression select antidepressants together but had no discernible effect on depression control and medication use and adherence, according ...

Decision aids help patients with depression feel better about medication choices

September 28, 2015
Choosing the right antidepressant can be a daunting task. With so many choices and such unpredictability in their individual effects, patients with depression often spend months or years casting about for the right medication, ...

Presenting options to patients: Menu approach good for patients and physicians

October 8, 2015
A significant proportion of medical treatment decisions, perhaps the majority, are not clear-cut. Which is better for a specific patient—medication or surgery, medication or talk therapy, or even no treatment? If medication, ...

Achieving patient-centered care across the spectrum

May 13, 2014
Providing patient-centered care consistently in clinical practice requires practitioners who are able to recognize that different clinical situations require different approaches and are skilled enough to adapt.

Study 'opens gate' to understanding depression

December 1, 2015
A new scientific model that incorporates the myriad drivers of depression could lead to more precise treatment for an illness that affects 350 million worldwide.

Recommended for you

Researchers crack the smile, describing three types by muscle movement

July 27, 2017
The smile may be the most common and flexible expression, used to reveal some emotions, cover others and manage social interactions that have kept communities secure and organized for millennia.

Even babies can tell who's the boss, UW research says

July 27, 2017
The charismatic colleague, the natural leader, the life of the party - all are personal qualities that adults recognize instinctively. These socially dominant types, according to repeated studies, also tend to accomplish ...

Ketamine for depression encouraging, but questions remain around long-term use

July 27, 2017
A world-first systematic review into the safety of ketamine as a treatment for depression, published in the prestigious Lancet Psychiatry, shows the risks of long-term ketamine treatment remain unclear.

Infants know what we like best, study finds

July 27, 2017
Behind the chubby cheeks and bright eyes of babies as young as 8 months lies the smoothly whirring mind of a social statistician, logging our every move and making odds on what a person is most likely to do next, suggests ...

DREAMers at greater risk for mental health distress

July 27, 2017
Immigrants who came to the United States illegally as small children and who meet the requirements of the Development Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, more commonly known as DREAMers, are at risk for mental health ...

Negativity, be gone—new online tool can retrain your brain

July 27, 2017
Anxiety and depression can have devastating effects on people's lives. In some cases, the mental disorders lead to isolation, poverty and poor physical health, things that often cascade to future generations.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.