Anxious, stressed post-election? Limit social media

November 11, 2016 by Christine Clarridge, The Seattle Times

Got the post-election blues? Want to celebrate your candidate's win without someone bringing you down? You know you could stay off your social-media accounts to keep your pulse low, but if you're like many of us, you can't cut the cord completely.

Here are some tips from Seattle-based counselor Julene Weaver and other social-media experts for setting boundaries that may help you steer clear of the most provocative posts and unchecked rumors.

Decide for yourself whether you really need to log in. Perhaps you'd rather listen to music. It may be healthier for you to avoid disturbing news and videos for a few days and that's OK, Weaver said.

Instead, try calling an old friend, going outside, exercising or playing a . If you still want to spend time on your , try prioritizing which sites are important to you, set a time limit and log off when done.

"Don't get on and scan and scan. Set boundaries about what you will say and stick to them," Weaver said. "Evaluate what is important for your mental health and have the courage to say no."

Here are four questions she asks clients to answer as they strive to create social-media buffers.

How much do you allow in?

Decide how long you will watch or listen to the news, said Weaver. A half hour, an hour a day, or in a week? Make a decision and try setting an alarm and then abiding by it. For those who are committed to getting their news fix, psychotherapist Philip Cushman suggests seeking balance by finding a well-written, well-reported article by someone's whose views oppose yours. "It's good to read things that help us think about, and try to understand, the other side."

What to keep out?

Can you skip what you know will be a disturbing image or video on your Facebook feed? Acknowledge and accept that some people matter more to you than others. Don't respond to views you don't agree with. If someone gloats, ignore them. And remember, it's perfectly fine, good even, to quietly unfollow or unfriend people who say things that raise your blood pressure. Why are you holding on? Let them go!

What should you keep in?

If you are a person who has trouble letting go of disturbing thoughts and images, Weaver advises logging in briefly and then setting a goal to interact positively and "create a wave of micro-kindnesses" to offset the constant negativity by, for example, "liking" others' posts, sharing inspiration and encouragement, posting a picture of something beautiful. "Let people know you are compassionate," Weaver said.

If you must share on political or contentious matters, do so in a calm and neutral tone and present evidence-based and accurate information.

What is OK to release and what's the best way to release it?

Weaver says when she decides to let go of something distressing, such as the rancor and bitterness that's been the hallmark of this election, it's easier to do so after she's taken a walk and interacted pleasantly with others. "Anything that lets me feel the flow of positive energy helps, like seeing a baby or a cute dog," she said.

Also, getting involved in a constructive causes can be liberating, Weaver said. She suggests sending cards to people, signing petitions and getting involved in groups that take political action.

One last thought. Before you start worrying about something that hasn't happened, think about how rumors and false stories spread on Twitter and Facebook faster than they can be verified.

According to First Draft News, a guide to navigating media from discovery to verification, "rumors" that are true are resolved generally within two hours while it takes closer to 14 hours for a false claim to be debunked online.

Researchers have found that tweets reporting unverified rumors are retweeted more often, therefore, spread further and more quickly than truths.

In addition, according to First Draft, there is a "small industry of fake news websites which publish fake content on a daily basis, aimed at generating and monetizing web traffic. While fact-checking is a growing field, it still produces less content on average than the fakers. It can't keep up."

Therefore, it's wise to verify information with what you consider to be a credible news source, whether that's, The Seattle Times , The Washington Post, or The Wall Street Journal, before you retweet or freak out.

Best yet, just wait a day and see what shakes out.

Explore further: 'Doc, this election's killing me!'

Related Stories

'Doc, this election's killing me!'

October 13, 2016
(HealthDay)—As Donald and Hillary duke it out on the campaign trail, Americans are feeling pummeled, too, a new poll finds.

Recommended for you

Serious loneliness spans the adult lifespan but there is a silver lining

December 18, 2018
In recent years, public health officials have warned about a rising epidemic of loneliness, with rates of loneliness reportedly doubling over the past 50 years. In a new study, researchers at University of California San ...

Junk food diet raises depression risk, researchers find

December 18, 2018
A diet of fast food, cakes and processed meat increases your risk of depression, according to researchers at Manchester Metropolitan University.

Looking on bright side may reduce anxiety, especially when money is tight

December 17, 2018
Trying to find something good in a bad situation appears to be particularly effective in reducing anxiety the less money a person makes, possibly because people with low incomes have less control over their environment, according ...

Levels of gene-expression-regulating enzyme altered in brains of people with schizophrenia

December 14, 2018
A study using a PET scan tracer developed at the Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) has identified, for the first time, epigenetic differences between the brains of individuals ...

Self-perception and reality seem to line-up when it comes to judging our own personality

December 14, 2018
When it comes to self-assessment, new U of T research suggests that maybe we do have a pretty good handle on our own personalities after all.

Video game players frequently exposed to graphic content may see world differently

December 13, 2018
People who frequently play violent video games are more immune to disturbing images than non-players, a UNSW-led study into the phenomenon of emotion-induced blindness has shown.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.