Review: Colon capsule endoscopy accurate in polyp detection

Review: colon capsule endoscopy accurate in polyp detection

(HealthDay)—Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), especially second-generation CCE (CCE-2), has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal polyps, according to a review published in the November issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Cristiano Spada, M.D., Ph.D., from Fondazione Policlinico Universitario in Rome, and colleagues conducted a systematic review to examine the accuracy of CCE for detecting . Accuracy values were calculated for polyps, overall and for first-generation (CCE-1) and CCE-2 capsules, using data from 14 studies with 2,420 patients (1,128 for CCE-1 and 1,292 for CCE-2).

The researchers found that the sensitivity of CCE-2 and CCE-1 for detecting polyps >6 mm was 86 and 58 percent, respectively, with corresponding specificity of 88.1 and 85.7 percent. For polyps >10 mm, the sensitivity of CCE-2 and CCE-1 was 87 and 54 percent, respectively, while corresponding specificity was 95.3 and 97.4 percent. All 11 invasive cancers detected by colonoscopy were identified by CCE-2.

"The sensitivity in detection of polyps >6 mm and >10 mm increased substantially between development of first-generation and second-generation colon capsules," the authors write. "High specificity values for detection of polyps by CCE-2 seem to be achievable with a 10-mm cut-off and in a screening setting."

Several authors disclosed financial ties to medical technology companies, including Medtronic, which funded the study.

More information: Full Text

Copyright © 2016 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Review: Colon capsule endoscopy accurate in polyp detection (2016, November 1) retrieved 15 April 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Capsule colonoscopy deemed 'adequate' alternative


Feedback to editors