Ethics study: Inconsistent state laws may complicate medical decision-making

April 12, 2017, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Senior author Daniel B. Kramer, M.D., M.P.H., a cardiac electrophysiologist at the Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC). Credit: BIDMC

A patchwork of state laws can make it confusing to navigate incapacitated patients' medical wishes. Without clear national standards, the problem may worsen as the nation's 75 million baby boomers continue to age, according to medical ethics research led by investigators at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, the Mayo Clinic and the University of Chicago's MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine.

"Decisions about withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining care are incredibly emotional and challenging," said Erin Sullivan DeMartino, MD, a pulmonary and critical care medicine physician at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota who led the study as part of a fellowship with the University of Chicago's MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics. "But when there is ambiguity about who is responsible for -making, it adds much more stress to that moment."

Fewer than 30 percent of Americans have "advance directives" or legal documents outlining their treatment preferences that can also grant someone power to make on their behalf. The documents are often used when a patient is unconscious, incapacitated or unable to speak for himself/herself and can dictate how to treat - or not treat - anything from a minor illness to a life-threatening injury. On average, 40 percent of hospitalized adults can't make their own medical decisions. In some intensive care units, that figure reaches 90 percent.

"We have medical technology we didn't have 50 years ago, so we have a whole group of people who - transiently or sometimes permanently - can't communicate with us and can't participate in their own life-and-death decisions," DeMartino said.

For patients without advance directives, most have laws dictating that medical decisions fall to someone else - typically a spouse, parent or child. But the legal surrogate may not always be someone who understands the patient's specific values and wishes. That presents both ethical and policy problems, researchers say.

"One important message from this study is that, in the absence of a clearly identified spokesperson, the decision-making process for incapacitated patients may vary widely depending on where they live," said Daniel B. Kramer, MD, MPH, a cardiac electrophysiologist at the Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and senior author of the study.

The investigators reviewed laws in 50 states and the District of Columbia to compile what's thought to be the first comprehensive analysis of the country's medical decision-making statutes. Their examination revealed a complex, conflicting and often confusing system that poses barriers to "safeguarding of patients' choices in their most vulnerable moments," according to the study.

The inconsistencies spanned topics that are both basic and complex. For example, 30 states require "alternate decision makers" to demonstrate an ability to engage in complex medical decisions, but none explain how to assess that ability. Only 35 states have what researchers call a "surrogacy ladder" establishing a hierarchy for who gets to make medical decisions in the absence of a durable power of attorney for health care, but these vary widely as to what sorts of decisions a surrogate can actually make.

In addition, some states included numerous details for what constitutes an appropriate decision-maker, listing everything from frequency of someone's contact with a patient to their availability to meet with clinicians in person, to their familiarity with a patient's values and religious beliefs. Other states don't mention anything aside from requiring decision-makers to be an adult. (The states even had conflicting definitions of "adult.")

While it's unclear whether this variation in statutes impacts clinical care, the research team said one thing is certain: disputes about medical treatment are happening on a regular basis inside hospitals and hospice programs, and there's no national standard or benchmark to guide families or physicians.

"The next steps will be to study how this variability plays out in practice, and whether specific kinds of treatment decisions, such as withdrawing life-sustaining therapy or mental health interventions, actually turn out differently in different states due to the way these laws are written," said Kramer.

Four of the paper's nine authors are affiliated with the University of Chicago's MacLean Center, which pioneered the formal study of clinical medical ethics in the early 1980s. The center runs the world's largest clinical medical ethics fellowship for health care providers.

"This study continues the MacLean Center's longstanding mission of examining critical issues in clinical medicine through research and training," said Mark Siegler, MD, MACP, an internist at the University of Chicago who directs the MacLean Center. "As medical ethicists - and practicing health care providers - we wanted to provide a comprehensive resource to help guide patients, families and other who are trying to resolve complicated ethical dilemmas."

Explore further: Study: Making medical decisions for a cognitively impaired family member is complicated

Related Stories

Study: Making medical decisions for a cognitively impaired family member is complicated

August 15, 2013
Decision-making by a surrogate for a family member who is unable to make medical decisions is more complicated than decision-making by patients themselves, according to a study from the Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University ...

Ensuring medical care is consistent with patient goals

November 14, 2016
It can be challenging to determine whether the medical care provided in a hospital or nursing home is consistent with the preferences of the patient and family as indicated in the patient's advance planning documents.

Kidney failure patients' advance directives are often inadequate

November 17, 2016
In a recent study, nearly half of kidney failure patients receiving dialysis had advance directives outlining their preferences related to end-of-life care, but only a very small minority of these directives addressed the ...

Many kidney failure patients lack advance directives near the end of life

January 5, 2017
A new study indicates that many nursing home residents receiving dialysis do not have advance directives that sufficiently address end-of-life treatment decisions. Those with advance directives that put limitations on treatments ...

Physicians should help families with decisions about end-of-life care

June 15, 2015
About 20 percent of Americans spend time in an intensive care unit around the time of their death, and most deaths follow a decision to limit life-sustaining therapies.

Recommended for you

Research finds a little exercise does a lot of good for ageing muscles

May 24, 2018
Getting old doesn't necessarily mean getting weak and frail – just a little bit of exercise can help maintain muscle mass and strength, Otago research has revealed.

Hot cars can hit deadly temperatures in as little as one hour

May 24, 2018
A lot can happen at 160 degrees Fahrenheit: Eggs fry, salmonella bacteria dies, and human skin will suffer third-degree burns. If a car is parked in the sun on a hot summer day, its dashboard can hit 160 degrees in about ...

In helping smokers quit, cash is king, e-cigarettes strike out

May 23, 2018
Free smoking cessation aids, such as nicotine patches and chewing gum, are a staple of many corporate wellness programs aimed at encouraging employees to kick the habit. But, new research shows that merely offering such aids ...

What makes us well? Diversity, health care, and public transit matter

May 23, 2018
Diverse neighbors. Health centers. Commuter trains. These community attributes, and other key factors, are linked to well-being and quality of life, according to Yale researchers.

Time spent sitting at a screen matters less if you are fit and strong

May 23, 2018
The impact of screen time on cardiovascular disease, cancer incidence and mortality may be greatest in people who have lower levels of grip-strength, fitness and physical activity, according to a study published in the open ...

Widely used e-cigarette flavoring impairs lung function

May 23, 2018
A new study has found that a common e-cigarette flavoring that has chemical characteristics similar to toxic chemicals found in cigarette smoke disrupts an important mechanism of the lungs' antibacterial defense system. The ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.