Costs up with specialist as predominant provider of care

Costs up with specialist as predominant provider of care

(HealthDay)—For older adults with multimorbidity, having a specialist as the predominant provider of care (PPC) is associated with higher spending and lower continuity of care, according to a study published online April 8 in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Julie P.W. Bynum, M.D., M.P.H., from the Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine in Lebanon, N.H., and colleagues conducted an observational study using propensity score matching involving beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with multimorbidity. Data were included for 3,934,942 beneficiaries with multimorbidity, of whom two-thirds had a primary care provider as their PPC.

The researchers found that, compared to those with a primary care PPC, individuals with a specialty PPC had more hospitalizations (40.3 more per 1,000) and higher ($1,781 more per beneficiary), although little difference was seen in mortality (0.2 percent higher) or preventable hospitalizations. The largest spending differences were seen for professional fees ($769 higher per beneficiary), inpatient stays ($572 higher per beneficiary), and outpatient facilities ($510 higher per beneficiary) (all P < 0.001). Individuals with a specialist PPC had lower continuity of care and saw more providers.

"Older adults with multimorbidity with a specialist as their main ambulatory care provider had higher spending and lower continuity of care than those whose PPC was in but similar clinical outcomes," the authors write.

Explore further

Chronic comorbidities raise hospitalization risk in dementia

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2017 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Costs up with specialist as predominant provider of care (2017, April 18) retrieved 20 January 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors