Study with infants suggests language not necessary for reasoning ability

March 16, 2018 by Bob Yirka, Medical Xpress report

A team of researchers from Spain, Hungary and Poland has found via a study with infants that language may not be a necessity for the ability to reason. In their paper published in the journal Science, the group describes their study and what they found, and also offer some opinions on how their findings might be used to better understand the ability to reason. Justin Halberda with Johns Hopkins University offers a Perspective piece on the work done by the team in the same journal issue.

For many years, have generally agreed that language is required for reasoning—in order to make sense of a scene, for example, a person might talk it over in their mind. But that might not actually be the case, as the researchers in this new study have shown. They enlisted two groups of volunteers, one consisting of infants 12 months old, the other of 19-month-old babies. Each of the volunteers watched videos, some which seemed to make sense logically, and others that did not. The researchers observed the participants' reactions.

The videos showed animated characters—initially, there were two of them, such as a dinosaur and a flower. Then the characters would be hidden behind a screen followed by a cup scooping up one of the characters. Then the screen would drop, revealing the second character. Sometimes it would be the expected second character, but sometimes it would not—it might be a second instance of the first character, or a different character altogether. To judge whether the infants were trying to make sense of the scene before them, the researchers monitored their eye focus—babies that are confused tend to stare longer.

A reconstruction of part of a typical experimental session. A 12-month-old infant is looking at an Inference movie, with an impossible outcome. The video was recorded with infrared light. The flickering of the video corresponds to the frame rate of the eye tracker, which also tracks the infant’s eyes by using low-emitting infrared lights. Credit: Ana Martín, Luca L. Bonatti & Nicolò Cesana Arlotti

The researchers report that the infants did, indeed, focus longer on the second character when it was not the one they expected to see. This is an example, the researchers claim, of evidence of reasoning. They note that in addition to offering evidence that language is not necessarily required for reasoning, the test they developed could potentially be to test for in .

An example of an animation used in Experiment 1, where the expected result occurs. Credit: N. Cesana-Arlotti et al., Science (2018)
An example of an animation used in Experiment 2, where an unexpected result occurs. Credit: N. Cesana-Arlotti et al., Science (2018)
An example of an animation used in Experiment 4, where an unexpected result occurs. Credit: N. Cesana-Arlotti et al., Science (2018)

Explore further: Infants recognize foreign languages as a form of communication

More information: Nicoló Cesana-Arlotti et al. Precursors of logical reasoning in preverbal human infants, Science (2018). DOI: 10.1126/science.aao3539

Infants are able to entertain hypotheses about complex events and to modify them rationally when faced with inconsistent evidence. These capacities suggest that infants can use elementary logical representations to frame and prune hypotheses. By presenting scenes containing ambiguities about the identity of an object, here we show that 12- and 19-month-old infants look longer at outcomes that are inconsistent with a logical inference necessary to resolve such ambiguities. At the moment of a potential deduction, infants' pupils dilated, and their eyes moved toward the ambiguous object when inferences could be computed, in contrast to transparent scenes not requiring inferences to identify the object. These oculomotor markers resembled those of adults inspecting similar scenes, suggesting that intuitive and stable logical structures involved in the interpretation of dynamic scenes may be part of the fabric of the human mind.

Related Stories

Infants recognize foreign languages as a form of communication

January 24, 2018
Infants recognize that speech in a language not their own is used for communication, finds a new psychology study. The results, which appear in the journal Cognition, offer new insights into how language is processed at a ...

Babies have logical reasoning before age one, study finds

November 18, 2015
Human infants are capable of deductive problem solving as early as 10 months of age, a new study by psychologists at Emory University and Bucknell finds. The journal Developmental Science is publishing the research, showing ...

Heartbeats could hold the key to understanding babies' inner world

August 8, 2017
Scientists from Royal Holloway, University of London have found that babies as young as five months are sensitive to their own heartbeats, and their research could pave the way to better understanding disorders such as anxiety, ...

Ten-month-old infants determine the value of a goal from how hard someone works to achieve it

November 23, 2017
Babies as young as 10 months can assess how much someone values a particular goal by observing how hard they are willing to work to achieve it, according to a new study from MIT and Harvard University.

Recommended for you

What social stress in monkeys can tell us about human health

December 11, 2018
Research in recent years has linked a person's physical or social environment to their well-being. Stress wears down the body and compromises the immune system, leaving a person more vulnerable to illnesses and other conditions. ...

The richer the reward, the faster you'll likely move to reach it, study shows

December 11, 2018
If you are wondering how long you personally are willing to stand in line to buy that hot new holiday gift, scientists at Johns Hopkins Medicine say the answer may be found in the biological rules governing how animals typically ...

Using neurofeedback to prevent PTSD in soldiers

December 11, 2018
A team of researchers from Israel, the U.S. and the U.K. has found that using neurofeedback could prevent soldiers from experiencing PTSD after engaging in emotionally difficult situations. In their paper published in the ...

Receiving genetic information can change risk

December 11, 2018
Millions of people in the United States alone have submitted their DNA for analysis and received information that not only predicts their risk for disease but, it turns out, in some cases might also have influenced that risk, ...

You make decisions quicker and based on less information than you think

December 11, 2018
We live in an age of information. In theory, we can learn everything about anyone or anything at the touch of a button. All this information should allow us to make super-informed, data-driven decisions all the time.

Trying to get people to agree? Skip the French restaurant and go out for Chinese food

December 11, 2018
Here's a new negotiating tactic: enjoy a family-style meal with your counterpart before making your opening bid.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Mar 16, 2018
Very cool. But isn't it obvious that animals reason without language? Why shouldn't humans?
not rated yet Mar 16, 2018
Just want to follow up my previous comment with a story:

I was hiking with my dog in the White Mountains. The trail was covered with leaves, so you couldn't see it. But my dog could smell it, so I just followed him.

We came to this huge boulder with a tunnel in it. I was surprised because I'd never hiked the trail before.

My dog sniffed to the left of the boulder. Then he sniffed to the right. And then - without sniffing - he dashed through the hole.

Pretty advanced reasoning for a "dumb" animal.
not rated yet Mar 18, 2018
They enlisted two groups of volunteers, one consisting of infants 12 months old, the other of 19-month-old babies.

Hang on! These infants are 'volunteers' so they 'volunteered' for this! How did they express their permission for participating in this experiment and what motivated them? They must have far greater reasoning ability than we thought.
not rated yet Mar 19, 2018
Of course! We think largely in images, not language, we translate thoughts into language when we wish to communicate them, or further refine them, for instance when writing. I have done some personal 'awareness' training in this, being objectively aware of thoughts.
Animals, as has been pointed out, who have limited 'language' as we understand it, clearly think without it; problem solve & react to signals and sounds. And when humans first created language, they had to have thought of it previously!
not rated yet Mar 19, 2018
Well, people born deaf, who shouldn't have a language as the rest of us do - as a verbal representation of thought, also can reason /and as much as I know, they also are able to function more or less normally before learning to read and write/, don't they? Did somebody missed that?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.