Researchers replicate famous marshmallow test, makes new observations

marshmallow
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A new replication study of the well-known "marshmallow test—a famous psychological experiment designed to measure children's self-control—suggests that being able to delay gratification at a young age may not be as predictive of later life outcomes as was previously thought.

Published in Psychological Science by Dr. Tyler W. Watts, an assistant professor of research and postdoctoral scholar at New York University's Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, and his colleagues, this replication uses a larger and more diverse sample of to reexamine whether the does in fact predict longer-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes.

Dr. Watts's research finds that although the marshmallow test conceived by psychologist Walter Mischel is related to later achievement, the relationship between a young child's ability to delay gratification and later outcomes is much weaker than previously thought. The new study discovered that while the ability to resist temptation and wait longer to eat the marshmallow (or another treat offered as a reward) did predict adolescent math and reading skills, the association was small and disappeared after the researchers controlled for characteristics of the child's family and early environment. And there was no indication that it predicted later behaviors or measures of personality. The authors concluded that interventions focused only on teaching young children to delay gratification are likely to be ineffective.

"Our findings suggest that an intervention that alters a child's ability to delay, but fails to change more general cognitive and behavioral capacities, will probably have very small effects on later outcomes," Dr. Watts explained. "If intervention developers hope to generate the kinds of improvements associated with the original marshmallow study, it is likely to be more fruitful to target the broader cognitive and behavioral abilities related to gratification delay."

The data for this study were drawn from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, a geographically diverse dataset widely used in the field of developmental psychology.

In addition to using a large sample (918 children), Dr. Watts created a subsample based on maternal education and focused much of the analysis on children whose mothers had not completed college by the time the child was born. This subsample was more representative of the racial and economic makeup of the broader population of children in the U.S. (though Hispanic children were still underrepresented). Participants in the original experiments were limited to children from the Stanford University community.

"I still remember, as an undergraduate, being fascinated by the findings from the famous marshmallow test when I first encountered them in my Introduction to Psychology course," Dr. Watts said. "Given the attention these findings still receive when decisions are made about the skills early-intervention programs should target, we thought it was important to revisit the older work by replicating the original experiment using a newer sample and updated statistical methods. Of course, these new findings should not be interpreted to suggest that gratification delay is completely unimportant, but rather that focusing only on teaching to delay is unlikely to make much of a difference."


Explore further

Study links delay of gratification to how brain structures are connected

Provided by New York University
Citation: Researchers replicate famous marshmallow test, makes new observations (2018, May 25) retrieved 23 February 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-05-replicate-famous-marshmallow.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1184 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 25, 2018
There's another correlation they might consider ~ do the children who hang out for ever more rather than settling for a more modest portion end up fatter than those who eat marshmallows in moderation?

What if the child only wants one marshmallow??

No wonder Americans are getting so fat if stuffing yourself with as many marshmallows as you can possibly lay your hands on is equated to self discipline...

There is another dimension to consider as well ~ a lot of kids don't trust adults so taking one immediately might well be the prudent option in their home environment.

May 26, 2018
Agree, RobertKarlStonjek. One more scenario, some children don't like marshmallows or chocolate that much. What does test mean then? Stupid experimenter?

Another valid question is, the people coming up with that test, what is their claim to fame to give the test? Lowly graduate students and their professors in publish or perish nothing to accomplish academia?


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more