Screening for impaired vision in older adults: New Canadian guideline

May 14, 2018, Canadian Medical Association Journal

A new Canadian guideline for impaired vision in older adults recommends against primary care screening of older adults not reporting concerns about their vision. The guideline, published in English and French in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal) by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC), is aimed at primary care practitioners.

Visual impairment describes less than 20/40 vision, which usually cannot be corrected with glasses, contact lenses or vision-related procedures. This level of difficulty with vision can affect quality of life, as well as participation in work, social and leisure activities, and increases the likelihood of injuries from falls and other accidents.

The considered the benefits of screening for visual impairment in primary health care and referring patients to optometrists for formal vision testing.

"We found no evidence of benefit to patients aged 65 years or older from being screened for impaired vision as a way to prevent limitations on daily living or other consequences," said Dr. Brenda Wilson, Task Force Impaired Vision Working Group Chair. "The task force therefore recommends against screening for impaired vision in primary care settings for people living independently in the community."

Currently, people must make their own appointments for regular vision screening or if they suspect visual problems. Most provinces in Canada cover comprehensive eye examinations for adults aged 65 years and older by eye care professionals.

The new guideline updates a previous guideline from 1995, which recommended screening for visual impairment in elderly patients with diabetes of at least 5 years' duration. The 2018 guideline is based on the latest and highest-quality evidence on screening, which includes 15 randomized controlled trials involving participants aged 65 years or older. It is consistent with the recommendation on screening for from the United States Preventive Services Task Force.

"Although does not appear to be effective, we need to look for ways to effectively support older Canadians who do experience so that they get the services they need from optometrists or other eye care professionals" said Dr. Brett Thombs, chair of the CTFPHC .

Explore further: New guideline for screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms

More information: Screening for impaired vision in community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older in primary care settings, https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.171430

Related Stories

New guideline for screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms

September 11, 2017
A new screening guideline from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), which cause approximately 1244 deaths every year in Canada, recommends one-time ultrasonography ...

USPSTF: more evidence needed for visual acuity screening

July 21, 2015
(HealthDay)—The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has concluded that there is currently insufficient evidence to assess the benefits and harms of screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults. These findings ...

Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care releases updated guideline

November 30, 2015
For adults aged 65 years or older living in the community, there is no benefit to screening for cognitive impairment if they are asymptomatic, according to a new Canadian guideline published in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association ...

Low rate of referral for low-vision rehabilitation

March 19, 2018
(HealthDay)—Few patients with irreversible vision impairment are referred for vision rehabilitation, according to a study published online March 15 in JAMA Ophthalmology.

Screening for impaired vision in older adults

March 1, 2016
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for impaired visual acuity (clearness of vision) in adults ...

Glaucoma screening not for everyone, experts say

July 9, 2013
(HealthDay)—Not enough evidence exists to recommend that primary-care doctors screen for glaucoma in adults who do not have vision problems, according to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Recommended for you

Satellite imaging techniques may help reduce preventable vision loss

May 11, 2018
By adapting pattern recognition techniques used to assess satellite images, scientists have devised a novel way to diagnose blinding eye diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration.

Ophthalmologists link immunotherapy with a serious eye condition

May 7, 2018
New immunotherapy treatments offer a remarkable chance for survival for patients with advanced melanoma and hard-to-treat cancers of the bladder, kidney and lung.

Burnout, depression can affect ophthalmology residents, study finds

May 4, 2018
A new study led by Brown University researchers finds that ophthalmology residents across the U.S. face a substantial burden of burnout and depression, which may affect not only the residents themselves but also the quality ...

AI better than most human experts at detecting cause of preemie blindness

May 3, 2018
An algorithm that uses artificial intelligence can automatically and more accurately diagnose a potentially devastating cause of childhood blindness than most expert physicians, a paper published in JAMA Ophthalmology suggests.

New diagnostic technique picks up the S in vision

May 1, 2018
A new technique that could help improve diagnosis of vision disorders has been successfully tested at the University of Bradford, UK.

A bit of dark chocolate might sweeten your vision

April 26, 2018
It may not replace prescription glasses, but a few bites of dark chocolate might offer a slight and temporary bump up in vision quality, new research suggests.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

KelDude
not rated yet May 14, 2018
These guidelines are totally inadequate. I have an astigmatism in my left eye which makes reading and tv watching a nightmare. Because it is not as bad as 20/40 vision, it is not covered by any medical plan yet it is still very difficult for most activities requiring good eyesight between 20cm and 300cm away. I tried a contact lens but because the astigmatism is actually double vision in that eye, I need a "toric" lens to correct that. The contact was weighted on one side to align with the two focal points, but rarely aligned correctly. It was as blurry with the lens as without it. The only real fix is a new lens installed in my eye for $1500 which is NOT covered by any medical plan. So to this day, I am as good as blind in one eye. The system is failing me completely.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.