Explainer: What is loss aversion and is it real?

August 21, 2018 by Brendan Markey-Towler, The Conversation
You may still feel losing a wallet more than finding it. Credit: Shutterstock

A recent study claims a core idea in behavioural economics – loss aversionis a fallacy. Loss aversion is the theory that the pain of losing something is greater than the pleasure we feel by gaining something equivalent.

Loss aversion forms the basis of a lot of behavioural economics, including analysis on The Conversation. It's used to inform very important decisions made in the halls of power. For instance, you could argue the government's controversial MyHealth record being framed as an "opt-out" system plays on loss aversion ("you want to take the risk we couldn't access your records in an emergency?").

Not only would it be very embarrassing were a central part of behavioural economics shown to be false, but the famed government "nudge units" would be left without one of the most important theories used to explain behaviour and formulate policy.

As with most vitriolic academic disputes, this is probably a bit of a storm in a teacup. But this new study has shown we need a better model of behavioural economics. One that helps us to understand when and why loss aversion affects our behaviour.

Diving into loss aversion

Have you ever been considering a big-ticket purchase (like a TV, a holiday, a house) or even a moderate purchase (like a nice dinner or some shares) and found the fear and displeasure at the prospect of it turning out to be a dud is on a different level to it being satisfactory?

That is loss aversion. Following the logic, we should expect people to be more motivated by avoiding losses than they are by seeking equivalent gains.

The authors of the new study, David Gal and Derek Rucker, surveyed the literature on loss aversion and found "little evidence to support loss aversion as a general principle".

In general, they found people don't strive to avoid losses any more than they seek gains across a wide variety of behaviours. So the theory is invalid.

However, this is a bit of a straw-man argument.

No one really believes losses are always more keenly felt than gains, or even that this is true on balance. Behavioural economists merely recognise it can be a factor.

A new model for behavioural economics

In fairness, behavioural economists have invited a straw-man view of loss aversion. Our best model doesn't really try to explain when and why loss aversion will be a factor, it just kind of assumes it's there.

Gal and Rucker themselves say in their paper it's not so much that loss aversion doesn't exist. It's just not as general as we might have thought. So we need a new and improved model for behavioural economics that helps us to explain when loss aversion might affect decision making, and when it might not.

I have previously outlined one such model. The crucial thing in this model is its shift from the "utility-based" view of the mind – that dominates economics – to a view of the mind as a network structure, much like the brain from which it emerges.

When you're making choices, your mind is trying to connect what you're seeing in the environment to what you've experienced and what you think might happen.

Say you're deciding where to have lunch. Your mind is trying to connect the incoming signals from your body and your environment to memories about what satisfied this sort of hunger in the past and your thoughts about what might satisfy it now.

In this context, if (and only if) the potential loss associated with some behaviour is connected with particularly severe potential consequences, we can expect loss aversion to affect behaviour.

Those consequences will dominate our perception and our thinking.

So, for example, when you're buying a house, the prospect of its value rising by A$100,000 is quite nice, but the prospect of its value declining by A$100,000 is disastrous. Negative equity in a house is no joke. We would expect you to display loss aversion in such an environment.

On the other hand, if you're trying out a new place to have lunch, the consequences of wasting A$10 on a not-so-great salad are more an annoyance than anything else. This is at least comparable with the delight of a A$10 salad being delicious. We wouldn't expect you to display much loss aversion in such an environment.

More research needs to be done to reformulate the theory of loss in this new context. But the good thing is years of research were not wasted, it's just that we now know there's much more to be done to refine our understanding of this crucial aspect of human behaviour. That, to me at least, is very exciting.

Explore further: Men, women evaluate losses differently in mating contexts, researcher says

More information: David Gal et al. The Loss of Loss Aversion: Will It Loom Larger Than Its Gain?, Journal of Consumer Psychology (2018). DOI: 10.1002/jcpy.1047

Related Stories

Men, women evaluate losses differently in mating contexts, researcher says

March 1, 2013
(Medical Xpress)—Much research in psychology and economics has shown that people are "loss averse," meaning they tend to weigh losses more strongly than equivalent gains. For example, people are more motivated by a loss ...

The neurobiological basis of leadership (Update)

August 3, 2018
Leaders are more willing to take responsibility for making decisions that affect the welfare of others. In a new study, researchers at the University of Zurich identified the cognitive and neurobiological processes that influence ...

Anxious people worry about risk, not loss

June 6, 2017
Life is a series of choices. Every time you make a decision, there is a possibility that things won't go as expected (risk) or that something bad will happen (loss). Aversion to risk and loss have powerful influences on how ...

Entrepreneurs aren't overconfident gamblers

September 17, 2014
Leaving one's job to become an entrepreneur is inarguably risky. But it may not be the fear of risk that makes entrepreneurs more determined to succeed. A new study finds entrepreneurs are also concerned about what they might ...

Fear of losing money, not spending habits, affects investor risk tolerance, study finds

July 30, 2014
As the U.S. economy slowly recovers, many investors remain wary about investing in the stock market. Investors' "risk tolerance," or their willingness to take risks, is an important factor for investors deciding whether, ...

Why some people resist authority

May 14, 2018
Control aversion—the urge to rebel against control over one's decisions—can be explained by connectivity between two regions of the brain as well as behavioral measures of distrust and lack of understanding, according ...

Recommended for you

The richer the reward, the faster you'll likely move to reach it, study shows

December 11, 2018
If you are wondering how long you personally are willing to stand in line to buy that hot new holiday gift, scientists at Johns Hopkins Medicine say the answer may be found in the biological rules governing how animals typically ...

Receiving genetic information can change risk

December 11, 2018
Millions of people in the United States alone have submitted their DNA for analysis and received information that not only predicts their risk for disease but, it turns out, in some cases might also have influenced that risk, ...

Using neurofeedback to prevent PTSD in soldiers

December 11, 2018
A team of researchers from Israel, the U.S. and the U.K. has found that using neurofeedback could prevent soldiers from experiencing PTSD after engaging in emotionally difficult situations. In their paper published in the ...

You make decisions quicker and based on less information than you think

December 11, 2018
We live in an age of information. In theory, we can learn everything about anyone or anything at the touch of a button. All this information should allow us to make super-informed, data-driven decisions all the time.

These bacteria may be the key to treating clinical depression

December 11, 2018
We like to think of ourselves as individuals.

Meditation adapts the brain to respond better to feedback

December 11, 2018
In a new study in the Journal of Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience researchers from the University of Surrey have discovered a link between meditation and how individuals respond to feedback.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.