Most online reviews for spine surgeons are surgeon-dependent

Most online reviews for spine surgeons are surgeon-dependent

(HealthDay)—Spine surgeons are more likely to receive favorable online reviews for factors pertaining to outcomes and likeability/character and negative reviews based on ancillary staff interactions and office environment, according to a study published online July 2 in Spine.

Chester J. Donnally III, M.D., from the University of Miami Hospital, and colleagues evaluated patient feedback and satisfaction scores of surgeons by using comments from three leading physician rating websites:,, and Comments were categorized based on surgeon competence; surgeon likeability/character (both surgeon-dependent); and office staff, ease of scheduling, and (all surgeon-independent).

The researchers used the North American Spine Society membership directory to identify 210 spine surgeons practicing in Florida (133 orthopedic-trained, 77 neurosurgery-trained) with online comments available for (4,701 patient comments). The vast majority of comments (89.9 percent) pertained to surgeon outcomes and likeability, while 10.1 percent were related to surgeon-independent factors. There was a significantly higher number of favorable ratings associated with surgeon-dependent comments than with surgeon-independent comments, and surgeon-independent comments were correlated with significantly lower scores than surgeon-dependent comments.

"Surgeons should continue to take an active role in modifying factors perceive as negative, even if not directly related to the physician," the authors write.

Explore further

Online reviews of spine surgeons—Staff and office factors may negatively affect ratings

More information: Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Journal information: Spine

Copyright © 2018 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Most online reviews for spine surgeons are surgeon-dependent (2018, August 7) retrieved 7 December 2021 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors