Moneyball in Medicare? It's working, study says

September 17, 2018, University of Michigan
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Incentives for hospitals to improve their quality and reduce costs do work, according to a new University of Michigan study.

The research shows that hospitals that participate in such programs benefit not only from direct payment from patients' treatment but also the good scores they get from patients on the treatment they receive.

"Hospitals traditionally think that how much they get paid by Medicare is just the predetermined payment for a patient with a particular condition," said Edward Norton, professor of health management and policy at the U-M School of Public Health and professor of economics at the College of Literature, Sciences, and the Arts.

If an elderly patient comes in with a heart attack, Medicare will not only reimburse the hospital for that hospital visit, but also pays an additional amount when hospitals do well on a variety of quality measures, he said. The total reimbursement, therefore, depends on how that patient affects all of the and how that changes the hospital combined score, which ultimately affects the financial payments to the hospitals in the future.

Norton, who is a member of the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, and colleagues used data from the Hospital Value-based Purchasing Program, a national program that rewards or penalizes hospitals based on their quality and episode-based costs. It also incentivizes integration between hospitals and post-acute care providers.

In their analysis, the researchers estimated the magnitude of the marginal future reimbursement for individual patients across each type of and performance measure. Then, they described how these incentives differ across hospitals, including integrated and .

"We found that hospitals improved their performance over time in the areas where they have the highest incentives to improve care, and that integrated hospitals responded more than non-integrated hospitals," Norton said. "If a patient does really well, they're happy, they go home, they don't die, they're not readmitted, the hospital's measures improve and the hospital will make more money in the future. So the total reimbursement for that patient is higher.

"If, on the other hand, the patient has a bad experience, doesn't get proper care, they spend a lot of money and then die within 30 days, all the measures get worse and the is penalized financially, possibly even enough that the hospitals could lose money overall."

Norton said their study also showed that there is a wide range when it comes to .

"For a lot of patients, there are actually no financial incentives to do better," he said. "But for some patients and some measures, it can be up to tens of thousands of dollars, so some hospitals have a large financial incentive to do better.

"When hospitals have a larger financial incentive to improve, they're more likely to improve. And that's really important because the whole premise of this program is to have a financial reward for doing better."

The study is published in the September issue of the Journal of Health Economics.

Explore further: Impact of US pay for performance programs 'limited and disappointing' say experts

More information: Edward C. Norton et al. Moneyball in Medicare, Journal of Health Economics (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.07.006

Related Stories

Impact of US pay for performance programs 'limited and disappointing' say experts

January 3, 2018
The impact of pay for performance programs in US hospitals has been "limited and disappointing" say experts in a study published by The BMJ today.

Hospitals face $218B in federal payment cuts from 2010 to 2028

July 6, 2018
(HealthDay)—Cumulative reductions in federal payments to hospitals from 2010 to 2028 are estimated to reach $218.2 billion, according to a study commissioned by the Federation of American Hospitals and the American Hospital ...

Magnet hospitals have better patient experiences, possibly enhancing reimbursement

October 7, 2015
Researchers from NYU and U. of Penn conclude that the possibility of a better patient experience is good for quality of care and good for hospitals' fiscal health.

Study examines how hospital payments for heart attack care may affect patient outcomes

March 14, 2018
In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on improving the value of health care by incentivizing reduced spending and improved outcomes. One such effort is the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program administered ...

'Pay for performance' incentives are hurting hospital finances in Mississippi delta

October 18, 2017
Two Medicare "pay for performance" programs have contributed to declining financial performance by hospitals in the Mississippi Delta region, suggests a study in the November issue of Medical Care.

Hospitals measure up for Medicare reimbursement

April 1, 2013
For-profit hospitals are out-performing other hospitals when treating stroke, heart attack and pneumonia patients in emergency departments and, thus, will be more likely to receive bonuses under Medicare's new payment rules, ...

Recommended for you

Funder involved in all aspects of most industry-funded clinical trials

October 3, 2018
In most industry funded trials reported in high impact medical journals, all aspects of the trial involved the industry funder, finds a study published by The BMJ today.

Educating the next generation of medical professionals with machine learning is essential

September 27, 2018
Artificial intelligence (AI) driven by machine learning (ML) algorithms is a branch in the field of computer science that is rapidly gaining popularity within the healthcare sector. However, graduate medical education and ...

Here's one reason why US healthcare costs so much

September 11, 2018
There is substantial waste in U.S. healthcare, but little consensus on how to identify or combat it.

New study examines predictors of patient-reported experiences at dialysis facilities

September 11, 2018
For patients with end-stage renal disease, dialysis treatments are vital and often are payed for by Medicare. In 2012, Medicare implemented a Quality Incentive Program scoring system, and in 2016, patient-reported experiences ...

Burnout in doctors has shocking impact on care, review finds

September 5, 2018
Burnout in doctors has devastating consequences on the quality of care they deliver, according to a large-scale systematic review and meta-analysis.

Who wins when a prescription copay exceeds the drug price? Not the patient

August 31, 2018
Prescription drug copayments often exceed the retail cost of a drug, a recent USC study reveals. This means that technically an overpayment occurs, and someone—not the patient—keeps the excess payment.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.