Scientists determine four personality types based on new data

Scientists determine four personality types based on new data
Northwestern University researchers have sifted through data from more than 1.5 million questionnaire respondents and found at least four distinct clusters of personality types. Credit: Northwestern University

Northwestern University researchers have sifted through data from more than 1.5 million questionnaire respondents and found at least four distinct clusters of personality types exist: average, reserved, self-centered and role model. The findings challenge existing paradigms in psychology.

The new study, led by Luís Amaral of the McCormick School of Engineering, will be published Sept. 17 by the journal Nature Human Behaviour. The findings potentially could be of interest to hiring managers and care providers.

"People have tried to classify personality types since Hippocrates' time, but previous scientific literature has found that to be nonsense," said co-author William Revelle, professor of psychology in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences.

"Now, these show there are higher densities of certain personality types," said Revelle, who specializes in personality measurement, theory and research.

Initially, however, Revelle was skeptical of the study's premise. The concept of personality types remains controversial in psychology, with hard scientific proof difficult to find. Previous attempts based on small research groups created results that often were not replicable.

"Personality types only existed in self-help literature and did not have a place in scientific journals," said Amaral, the Erastus Otis Haven Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering at Northwestern Engineering. "Now, we think this will change because of this study."

The new research combined an alternative computational approach with data from four questionnaires with more than 1.5 million respondents from around the world obtained from John Johnson's IPIP-NEO with 120 and 300 items, respectively, the myPersonality project and the BBC Big Personality Test datasets. The questionnaires, developed by the research community over the decades, have between 44 and 300 questions. People voluntarily take the online quizzes attracted by the opportunity to receive feedback about their own personality. These data are now being made available to other researchers for independent analyses.

"The thing that is really, really cool is that a study with a dataset this large would not have been possible before the web," Amaral said. "Previously, maybe researchers would recruit undergrads on campus, and maybe get a few hundred people. Now, we have all these online resources available, and now data is being shared."

From those robust datasets, the team plotted the five widely accepted basic personality traits: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness.

After developing new algorithms, four clusters emerged:

Average
Average people are high in neuroticism and extraversion, while low in openness. "I would expect that the typical person would be in this cluster," said Martin Gerlach, a postdoctoral fellow in Amaral's lab and the paper's first author. Females are more likely than males to fall into the Average type.

Reserved
The Reserved type is emotionally stable, but not open or neurotic. They are not particularly extraverted but are somewhat agreeable and conscientious.

Role Models
Role Models score low in neuroticism and high in all the other traits. The likelihood that someone is a increases dramatically with age. "These are people who are dependable and open to new ideas," Amaral said. "These are good people to be in charge of things. In fact, life is easier if you have more dealings with role models." More women than men are likely to be role models.

Self-Centered
Self-Centered people score very high in extraversion and below average in openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness. "These are people you don't want to hang out with," Revelle said. There is a very dramatic decrease in the number of self-centered types as people age, both with women and men.

The group's first attempt to sort the data used traditional clustering algorithms, but that yielded inaccurate results, Amaral said.

Scientists determine four personality types based on new data
The four newly determined personality types are based on five widely-recognized character traits. Credit: Northwestern University
"At first, they came to me with 16 personality types, and there's enough literature that I'm aware of that says that's ridiculous," Revelle said. "I believed there were no types at all."

He challenged Amaral and Gerlach to refine their data.

"Machine learning and data science are promising but can be seen as a little bit of a religion," Amaral said. "You still need to test your results. We developed a new method to guide people to solve the clustering problem to test the findings."

Their algorithm first searched for many clusters using traditional clustering methods, but then winnowed them down by imposing additional constraints. This procedure revealed the four groups they reported.

"The data came back, and they kept coming up with the same four clusters of higher density and at higher densities than you'd expect by chance, and you can show by replication that this is statistically unlikely," Revelle said.

"I like data, and I believe these results," he added. "The methodology is the main part of the paper's contribution to science."

To be sure the new clusters of types were accurate, the researchers used a notoriously self-centered group—teenaged boys—to validate their information.

"We know teen boys behave in self-centered ways," Amaral said. "If the data were correct and sifted for demographics, they would they turn out to be the biggest cluster of people."

Indeed, young males are overrepresented in the Self-Centered group, while females over 15 years old are vastly underrepresented.

Along with serving as a tool that can help mental health service providers assess for types with extreme traits, Amaral said the study's results could be helpful for hiring managers looking to insure a potential candidate is a good fit or for people who are dating and looking for an appropriate partner.

And good news for parents of teenagers everywhere: As people mature, their often shift. For instance, older people tend to be less neurotic yet more conscientious and agreeable than those under 20 years old.

"When we look at large groups of people, it's clear there are trends, that some people may be changing some of these characteristics over time," Amaral said. "This could be a subject of future research."


Explore further

16 going on 66: Will you be the same person 50 years from now?

More information: A robust data-driven approach identifies four personality types across four large data sets, Nature Human Behaviour (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0419-z , https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0419-z
Provided by Northwestern University
Citation: Scientists determine four personality types based on new data (2018, September 17) retrieved 23 March 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-09-scientists-personality-based.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1264 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 17, 2018
Very sceptical, social pressures and norms have real influences on how people develop. I have serious doubts that a questionnaire can determine personality "type"

Sep 17, 2018
A questionnaire cannot determine personality type. The individuals person determines his/her personality. The questions try to elucidate the characteristics.

Where can we answer the questionnaire for ourselves?

Sep 17, 2018
It would be interesting to know what percentage of people fell into these 4 categories. It might be that they were somewhat more common than any other combinations of traits, but not really enough to make them a particularly useful.

For example, let's say 5% of people fell into each group. Considering the number of combinations of the 5 traits, 5% would represent a significant departure from average. But it would only account for 20% of people. I doubt that would be useful in real life. And it might be far less than 5% each and still be statistically significant.

The article costs $9 to read. And I don't feel like spending that. I suspect it has the numbers in it.

Sep 18, 2018
These personality types are contextual. For a given condition, such as the condition in which the personality is evaluated, each individual will lean toward one or the other personality.

A reverse process could also be applied whereby the condition in which each personality type is displayed for each individual is assessed.

So "subject A is predominantly self-centred in the following condition..."
as opposed to:
"In the test condition subject A displays the following personality type."

Considering that people actually have personality types is flawed thinking, especially when the evaluation is done in a condition in which the subject is almost never subjected to eg the work/office environment where an individual works alone and interacts only with family and friends.

Sep 18, 2018
What do they mean here by conscientiousness?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more