Largest ever study of psychological sex differences and autistic traits

empathy
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Scientists at the University of Cambridge have completed the world's largest ever study of typical sex differences and autistic traits. They tested and confirmed two long-standing psychological theories: the Empathizing-Systemizing theory of sex differences and the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism.

Working with the television production company Channel 4, they tested over half a million , including over 36,000 autistic people. The results are published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The Empathizing-Systemizing theory predicts that women, on average, will score higher than men on tests of , the ability to recognize what another person is thinking or feeling, and to respond to their state of mind with an appropriate emotion. Similarly, it predicts that men, on average, will score higher on tests of systemizing, the drive to analyse or build rule-based systems.

The Extreme Male Brain predicts that autistic people, on average, will show a masculinised shift on these two dimensions: namely, that they will score lower than the typical population on tests of empathy and will score the same as if not higher than the typical population on tests of systemizing.

Whereas both theories have been confirmed in previous studies of relatively modest samples, the new findings come from a massive sample of 671,606 people, which included 36,648 autistic people. They were replicated in a second sample of 14,354 people. In this new study, the scientists used very brief 10-item measures of empathy, systemizing, and autistic traits.

Using these short measures, the team identified that in the typical population, women, on average, scored higher than men on empathy, and men, on average, scored higher than women on systemizing and autistic traits. These were reduced in autistic people. On all these measures, autistic people's scores, on average, were 'masculinized': that is, they had higher scores on systemizing and autistic traits and lower scores on empathy, compared to the typical population.

The team also calculated the difference (or 'd-score') between each individual's score on the systemizing and empathy tests. A high d-score means a person's systemizing is higher than their empathy, and a low d-score means their empathy is higher than their systemizing.

They found that in the typical population, men, on average, had a shift towards a high d-score, whereas women, on average, had a shift towards a low d-score. Autistic individuals, on average, had a shift towards an even higher d-score than typical males. Strikingly, d-scores accounted for 19 times more of the variance in autistic traits than other variables, including sex.

Finally, men, on average, had higher autistic trait scores than women. Those working in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), on average, had higher systemizing and scores than those in non-STEM occupations. And conversely, those working in non-STEM occupations, on average, had had higher empathy scores than those working in STEM.

In the paper, the authors discuss how it is important to bear in mind that differences observed in this study apply only to group averages, not to individuals. They underline that these data say nothing about an individual based on their gender, autism diagnosis, or occupation. To do that would constitute stereotyping and discrimination, which the authors strongly oppose.

Further, the authors reiterate that the two theories are applicable to only two dimensions of typical sex differences: empathy and systemizing. They do not apply to all sex differences, such as aggression, and to extrapolate the theories beyond these two dimensions would be a misinterpretation.

Finally, the authors highlight that although autistic people on average struggle with 'cognitive' empathy—recognizing other people's thoughts and feelings—they nevertheless have intact 'affective' empathy—they care about others. It is a common misunderstanding that autistic people struggle with all forms of empathy, which is untrue.

Dr. Varun Warrier, from the Cambridge team, said: "These sex differences in the typical population are very clear. We know from related studies that individual differences in empathy and systemizing are partly genetic, partly influenced by our prenatal hormonal exposure, and partly due to environmental experience. We need to investigate the extent to which these observed sex differences are due to each of these factors, and how these interact."

Dr. David Greenberg, from the Cambridge team, said: "Big data is important to draw conclusions that are replicable and robust. This is an example of how scientists can work with the media to achieve big data science."

Dr. Carrie Allison, from the Cambridge team, said: "We are grateful to both the general public and to the autism community for participating in this research. The next step must be to consider the relevance of these findings for education, and support where needed."

Professor Simon Baron-Cohen, Director of the Autism Research Centre at Cambridge who proposed these two theories nearly two decades ago, said: "This research provides strong support for both theories. This study also pinpoints some of the qualities autistic people bring to neurodiversity. They are, on average, strong systemizers, meaning they have excellent pattern-recognition skills, excellent attention to detail, and an aptitude in understanding how things work. We must support their talents so they achieve their potential—and society benefits too."


Explore further

Study finds that genes play a role in empathy

More information: David M. Greenberg el al., "Testing the Empathizing–Systemizing theory of sex differences and the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism in half a million people," PNAS (2018). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1811032115
Citation: Largest ever study of psychological sex differences and autistic traits (2018, November 12) retrieved 24 October 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-11-largest-psychological-sex-differences-autistic.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
611 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Nov 13, 2018
Yes, males and females are different in our natural predilections. Anyone observing a group of men admiring a new car or group of women fawning over a new baby will notice that men are drawn to things, women people. Only in modern academia, where radical leftist have taken over the Humanities, is it news that biology isn't a "construct". Yes , we are in fact born that way, No need to sample 671,606 people to figure that out.

Nov 13, 2018
There is a liberal crossover in d scores with some percentage of females scoring higher than some percentage of males, most probably around a quarter to a third of females score higher than the same percentage of males.

There are many traits making up an individual and singling out just two to characterise males and females is somewhat insulting to both. Males with a lower d score than the average female are no less male and those with a high d score are no more male, they are all male.

Strength is another property higher in males on average. Are slender un-athletic males less masculine? Was Gandhi less of a man than Schwarzenegger? Many of the most celebrated men through history had low d scores.

The time for dividing men and women up via stereotypical traits has long past us by, time to move on. The concept of 'Extreme Male' belongs in the 19th century, high d or ultra-high d at least has a scientific ring about it.

Nov 13, 2018
We are the way we are because it works. Over days, years, centuries, and millenniums.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more