Researchers compare running economy in Nike shoe, track spikes

GVSU researcher compares running economy in Nike shoe, track spikes
At left, Jordan Juzwiak and Kyle Barnes, GVSU assistant professor of exercise science, are pictured in the GVSU Recreation Center while one of their test subjects runs on a treadmill. They are trying to determine if shoes improve the energy spent by a runner. Credit: Amanda Pitts

In 2014, shoe giant Nike began developing a shoe for elite marathon runners to help them run a marathon in under two hours. In September, a Kenyan running the Berlin Marathon came close with a world record time of 2:01:39.

Kyle Barnes, assistant professor of movement science at Grand Valley State University in Michigan, has researched strategies to improve running economy and performance for years.

He incorporated the Nike Vaporfly 4% (NVF) shoes in his studies and in October published results in the journal Sports Medicine that validated Nike's original study results giving the the 4% name, while at the same time, comparing the NVF to traditional track spikes worn during track racing. It's considered the first study to compare NVF with a spike shoe.

Barnes' co-author is Andrew Kilding, from the Sports Performance Research Institute in New Zealand. They compared the metabolic cost of running in three different shoes—NVF, Nike Zoom Matumbo 3 with track spikes, and Adidas Adizero Adios 3 (ADI) a marathon shoe. Results from their study are below.

  • NVF shoe improved running economy by an average of 2.6 percent compared to track spikes, and 4.2 percent compared to ADI.
  • NVF lowered rates of oxygen update (improved running economy) and improved performance and should be considered a viable option for track and road racing.

Barnes said lighter running shoes reduce the inertia of a leg swing, therefore reducing energy spent. He said the NVF is built with a special foam and carbon-fiber plate that helps propel athletes forward more efficiently than other shoes, but added that exactly how this occurs is not fully understood.

For the study, Barnes used 24 highly trained runners, including men and women from Grand Valley's track and field team. Participants ran on a level treadmill made to accommodate spikes. He said after a warm-up, runners ran for five minutes at three different speeds in each of the three shoes.

"If the NVF improves running economy by several percentage points, it would make sense that these shoes can be used during road and distance track racing," Barnes said.

Barnes has since continued this line of research, incorporating Adidas' version of a sub-two-hour shoe (Adidas Sub2) in studies.


Explore further

What makes the world's fastest shoe so fast? New study provides insight

More information: Kyle R. Barnes et al. A Randomized Crossover Study Investigating the Running Economy of Highly-Trained Male and Female Distance Runners in Marathon Racing Shoes versus Track Spikes, Sports Medicine (2018). DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-1012-3
Citation: Researchers compare running economy in Nike shoe, track spikes (2018, December 12) retrieved 26 June 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-12-economy-nike-track-spikes.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
2 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more