When measuring resilience, the type of trauma suffered matters

When measuring resilience, the type of trauma suffered matters
Credit: stock.adobe.com

In previous studies of resilience in people, researchers have rarely differentiated in their analysis between the types of traumatic events experienced by individuals. However, the type of trauma undergone seems to be a significant predictor of how someone will fare long-term, according to a new study by researchers at the Yale School of Medicine and the VA Connecticut Healthcare System. Additionally, the team found that reactions to various types of trauma differs greatly by gender.

This paper was published online in the Journal of Traumatic Stress.

Researchers assessed data examining trauma exposure, deployment experiences, and resilience in a subsample of veterans who participated in a large, three-phase examining gender differences in and healthcare utilization among veterans who served in support of the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"When we first analyzed the data without accounting for the type of trauma experienced, it looked as though veteran men were overall more resilient than women following military discharge," said Galina Portnoy, associate research scientist at Yale, psychologist at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, and lead author of the study. "But I work with women veterans every day, and I suspected this wasn't the whole story."

For further analysis, the team separated potentially traumatic events into multiple interpersonal (i.e., , rape, and ) and non-interpersonal (i.e. accidents, combat trauma, stranger violence) events. Once the researchers had statistically accounted for the type of trauma, suddenly men were no longer scoring as more resilient than women.

"It turns out that interpersonal trauma has significant consequences for those who experience it, and given that those who experience interpersonal trauma are disproportionately women, this was initially skewing the data," said Portnoy. "Additionally, during stressful periods in one's life, such as military deployment, makes a huge difference in one's ability to cope, survive, and thrive." Related to this, they also found that, compared to men, women reported experiencing less social support during deployment.

Portnoy and her co-authors have concluded that "the way our field currently studies 'resilience' may need re-thinking." They say that men and individuals with more resources (i.e., socioeconomic status, education, income, and employment)—or "social privilege"— often score higher on measures of resilience. In other words, the researchers said, these privileges may be contributing more to those rather than any innate capacity those individuals have for resilience.

Therefore, they advocate shifting the way and resilience are studied, away from only "identifying characteristics within the individual (e.g., a person's ability to cope with triggers)" and towards accounting for "factors within a person's social-ecological context that serve to promote or inhibit resilient processes and outcomes, such as social support or the types of traumas they have experienced in the past."

Explore further

Abuse and neglect associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk for lesbian and bisexual women

More information: Galina A. Portnoy et al. Understanding Gender Differences in Resilience Among Veterans: Trauma History and Social Ecology, Journal of Traumatic Stress (2018). DOI: 10.1002/jts.22341
Journal information: Journal of Traumatic Stress

Provided by Yale University
Citation: When measuring resilience, the type of trauma suffered matters (2018, December 19) retrieved 30 September 2022 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-12-resilience-trauma.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors