Study suggests facial masculinity not a sexual ornament signaling mate quality in humans

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

A team of researchers from Pennsylvania State University and Universiteit Leuven has found evidence that suggests facial masculinity is not a sexual ornament signaling mate quality in humans. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the group reports their comparison of facial masculinity with both height and immunocompetence, and what they found.

The masculine facial features have long been considered attractive to females, and thus to be a sexual ornament, akin to peacock tails and deer antlers. But that might not be the case after all. The researchers with this new effort suggest facial masculinity does not pass other tests of ornamentation.

To find out more about the role facial masculinity might play for human males in attracting females, the researchers showed 3-D images of men and women to 1,233 people of European ancestry to judge the level of masculinity in their faces. They then compared the level of masculinity to height and found what they describe as a correlation—taller people appeared to also have more masculine faces. But the correlation applied to both genders, so this finding does not demonstrate that facial masculinity is ornamental for men.

The researchers then turned to immunocompetence as a measure of attractiveness—prior studies have shown that women are more attracted to men that appear to be healthier, and thus more immune to diseases. Historically, it has improved the chances of reproductive success. One way to measure this has been using heterozygosity at the —a marker in the genome that has been identified as a measure of how well a person's immune system works. The team conducted such a test on the people who had appeared in the 3-D images and found that there was no between the degree of masculinity and immunocompetence. They claim these factors taken together suggest that facial in men is not a sexual ornament. They further note that immunocompetence could be correlated with height, however, offering more evidence that is serves as an attractive feature for women seeking a promising mate.

Explore further

A handsome face could mean lower semen quality

More information: Arslan A. Zaidi et al. Facial masculinity does not appear to be a condition-dependent male ornament and does not reflect MHC heterozygosity in humans, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2019). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1808659116 ,

© 2019 Science X Network

Citation: Study suggests facial masculinity not a sexual ornament signaling mate quality in humans (2019, January 16) retrieved 17 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 16, 2019
The conclusion of this article is extremely obvious to anyone who has a few brain cells to rub together. Male humans have no sexual ornamentation whereas females have all of it; an interesting contrast to almost all other animal species.

Jan 16, 2019
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Jan 16, 2019
Male humans have many traits that are attractive to females, like height, body hair, muscles, body odours, even they way in which some men move is attractive to women.

And in relation to the male's face, women during ovulation find masculine men more attractive, whereas during the menstrual period, they find men with feminine faces more attractive. Facial hair in men has been considered attractive by women in many studies. Boldness has been considered a factor for attraction, because it indicates masculinity since it happens mainly to men, and is related to testosterone content.

I would speculate that women find men with long cared hair as more attractive than men with short hair. Remember that the tradition of keeping the hair short and shaving the face in men is related to military tradition (as reduces the chances of being grabbed in battle), not as response to what women consider attractive.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more