Larger physician bonus may improve care in chronic disease

Larger physician bonus may improve care in chronic disease

(HealthDay)—Increased bonus size for physicians caring for patients with chronic disease is associated with improvements in care quality, according to a study published online Feb. 8 in JAMA Network Open.

Amol S. Navathe, M.D., Ph.D., from the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Philadelphia, and colleagues examined whether increasing bonus size or adding the behavioral economic principles of increased (ISP) or loss aversion (LA) improves the effectiveness of pay-for-performance. Patients were cluster-randomized by practice site to an active control group (larger bonus size [LBS] only) or to groups with behavioral economic interventions added. In addition, a cohort study compared changes in outcomes among patients of physicians receiving an LBS to outcomes for physicians not receiving an LBS. A total of 8,118 patients with one of five chronic conditions were included.

Overall, 54 physicians were randomly assigned to one of three groups; 33 physicians and 3,747 were included in the final analysis. The researchers observed no differences in the LBS-only versus the intervention groups (LBS plus ISP and LBS plus LA). Relative to the comparison group, increased bonus size was correlated with a greater increase in evidence-based care (risk-standardized absolute difference-in-differences, 3.2 percentage points).

"Increasing bonus sizes was associated with improvements in quality, whereas adding an opportunity for LA and the proportion of incentive based on did not lead to additional benefit," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical, , and health insurance industries.

Explore further

Mandibular contour surgery training system beneficial

More information: Abstract/Full Text
Journal information: JAMA Network Open

Copyright © 2019 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Larger physician bonus may improve care in chronic disease (2019, February 13) retrieved 24 February 2020 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments