Families with a higher socioeconomic position have a greater risk of exposure to chemicals

A higher socioeconomic position is associated with greater exposure to several environmental chemical contaminants such as various per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), mercury and arsenic during pregnancy and childhood. This is the conclusion of a new European study carried out by the Barcelona Institute of Global Heath (ISGlobal), which describes the relationship between the socioeconomic position of 1,300 pregnant women and their children of aged six to 12 years and exposure to 41 environmental contaminants.

To date, several studies have shown that there is a relationship between -income, , employment and education- and the level of to a number of environmental risks, but with varying results: some support while others contradict the traditional hypothesis that disadvantaged groups are at highest risk. For example, another study by ISGlobal showed that the socioeconomic level of determines the environmental risk they are exposed to, but the nature of the relationship varies according to the where they live.

The new research, which is part of the HELIX Project, has been carried out using birth cohorts from six European countries—Spain, France, Greece, Lithuania, Norway and the United Kingdom. Researchers collected urine and blood samples from the pregnant and their children to find mean concentrations of biomarkers of the chemical contaminants. Additionally, the mothers completed questionnaires on their education, employment and family affluence level.

The results, which have been published in the International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, showed that pregnant women with a higher socioeconomic level had a higher risk of exposure to several per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), mercury, arsenic, several phenols and pesticides, compared to women with lower socioeconomic levels. Similarly, children from families with a higher social position had a higher risk of exposure to organochlorine compounds, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), mercury, arsenic and bisphenol A.

Conversely, in lower socioeconomic levels, a higher risk of exposure was only found in the case of cadmium during pregnancy and lead and phthalate metabolites in childhood.

"As far as the exposure of pregnant women and children to persistent pollutants is concerned, a clear trend of higher concentrations in the cases of higher socioeconomic level was found," says Parisa Montazeri, ISGlobal researcher and lead author of the publication. Additionally, she adds that "possible explanations should be sought in differences in diet, smoking, and use of consumer products such as cosmetics, between families of different socioeconomic positions. For example, tobacco smoking explained part of the higher cadmium concentrations observed in women with lower socioeconomic levels."

Martine Vrijheid, ISGlobal researcher and coordinator of the study, says that "many of the chemical contaminants studied are suspected to have a negative impact on child and adult health." The same health outcomes are also known to be influenced by socioeconomic inequalities. "In future studies, it is important to analyse the effects on health of environmental contaminants taking into account the role of socioeconomic position."


Explore further

Exposure to chemicals during pregnancy is not associated with an increase in blood pressure

More information: Parisa Montazeri et al, Socioeconomic position and exposure to multiple environmental chemical contaminants in six European mother-child cohorts, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.04.002
Citation: Families with a higher socioeconomic position have a greater risk of exposure to chemicals (2019, May 14) retrieved 19 June 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-05-families-higher-socioeconomic-position-greater.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
2 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more