Operative versus non-operative treatment for two-part proximal humerus fracture

Operative versus non-operative treatment for 2-part proximal humerus fracture
The results of this trial have been published in the PLOS Medicine journal. Credit: PLOS Medicine

The results of a recent nordic collaboration study showed that there is no difference in functional results between operative and non-operative treatment in persons aged 60 or more with displaced proximal humerus fractures.

Proximal humerus fractures are more common in than in . This fracture usually occurs as a result of falling, usually at home, directly on to the shoulder. In the proximal humerus, the bone is more fragile than lower in the forearm. The healing potential in the proximal humerus is, however, better than lower in the forearm.

In the study, published in Plos Medicine, only fractures with a significant displacement between bone fragments were included. Traditionally, humerus have been operatively treated using a metal plate and screws. In the non-operative treatment group, patients used a collar and cuff sling for three weeks and underwent instructed physiotherapy.

The trial included 88 patients who were followed for two years, and was conducted as a multinational, multicenter study in six trauma centers.

The findings of the study are novel and challenge current treatment protocols. "Moreover, the result had a on both the lives of the patients as well as on the economic cost of treatment," says Aare Märtson, Professor in Orthopedics at the University of Tartu Institute of Clinical Medicine.

Abandoning those procedures that offer no benefit to the patient could result in savings of up to one million euros per year. Furthermore, patient recovery will be as successful as previously but without the surgery-related pain and complications.

The leading center was Tampere University Hospital, Finland. Other centers included Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Finland; Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm; Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden; Viborg Hospital in Denmark; and Tartu University Hospital in Estonia.

The next step for the NITEP study group is to assess whether older adults would benefit from surgery after distal radius fracture.


Explore further

Study compares outcomes for surgical vs. non-surgical treatment of broken shoulder

More information: Antti P. Launonen et al. Operative versus non-operative treatment for 2-part proximal humerus fracture: A multicenter randomized controlled trial, PLOS Medicine (2019). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002855
Journal information: PLoS Medicine

Provided by Estonian Research Council
Citation: Operative versus non-operative treatment for two-part proximal humerus fracture (2019, July 19) retrieved 24 August 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-07-non-operative-treatment-two-part-proximal-humerus.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
4 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more