Barriers exist to using risk stratification tools to evaluate pulmonary embolism in the ED

Barriers exist to using risk stratification tools to evaluate pulmonary embolism in the ED
Semistructured interviews with 23 emergency department providers, hospitalists, and primary care providers in New England. Credit: Kirsty Challen, B.Sc., MBCHB, MRES, Ph.D., Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, United Kingdom

Common barriers exist to the use of risk stratification tools in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department and provide insight into where to focus efforts for future implementation endeavors. That is the conclusion of a study to be published in the June 2020 issue of Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM), a journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM).

The lead author of the study is Lauren M. Westafer DO, MPH, MS, assistant professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate. The findings of the study are discussed in a recent AEM podcast, Teacher, Teacher—Tell Me How to Do It (Diagnose a PE).

According to the study findings, provider-level factors such as risk avoidance and lack of knowledge of the tools dominated as barriers, while inner-setting factors were identified as facilitators.

The authors recommend that future efforts to improve evidence-based diagnosis of pulmonary embolism should focus on implementation strategies targeting these domains.

Commenting on the study is Dr. Kerstin de Wit, an emergency and thrombosis physician and Hamilton Health Sciences and an assistant professor in the department of at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

"This important study highlights several common thought processes which act as barriers for emergency physician use of evidence-based pulmonary embolism testing. The authors identified opportunities to promote adherence to evidence-based testing, including leveraging culture and peer pressure."

Explore further

Better way to interpret blood tests to diagnose pulmonary embolism

More information: Lauren M. Westafer et al, Provider Perspectives on the Use of Evidence‐based Risk Stratification Tools in the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism: A Qualitative Study, Academic Emergency Medicine (2020). DOI: 10.1111/acem.13908
Journal information: Academic Emergency Medicine

Provided by Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Citation: Barriers exist to using risk stratification tools to evaluate pulmonary embolism in the ED (2020, June 15) retrieved 19 September 2021 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors