Cancer biomarker data is not diverse, with implications for immunotherapy patients from underrepresented groups

dna
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

High tumor mutational burden—the number of mutations found inside cancer cells—may not generalize as an accurate biomarker across diverse cancer patient populations, researchers report on September 29 in the journal Cancer Cell. The results could have important implications for clinical decision-making regarding treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a type of immunotherapy.

"The study identified potential technical issues with high tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a biomarker in diverse populations that had not been previously appreciated," says co-senior study author Alexander Gusev of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School. "Biomarker studies of under-represented populations are critical to ensure that disparities are minimized in the era of precision medicine."

Recently, the ICI pembrolizumab received approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of solid tumors with high TMB. As TMB is adopted in clinical decision-making, its generalizability to diverse real-world settings is a prerequisite for its validity and utility as a biomarker. Separate from the question of accurate TMB estimation, it is critical to understand the generalizability of TMB as a biomarker in diverse patient cohorts, as the TMB-high cutoff is established in studies of primarily white patients with European ancestry. Yet the extent to which the TMB-high classification generalizes as an accurate biomarker in diverse patient populations is largely unknown.

To address this , Gusev and co-senior study author Jian Carrot-Zhang of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center analyzed the genetic ancestry of more than 2,000 ICI-treated patients with common solid tumor types. They assessed clinical outcomes such as overall survival and time to ICI failure. "To our knowledge, this is the largest analysis of the interplay between genetic ancestry, TMB, and immunotherapy outcomes," Gusev says.

In two independent clinical cohorts, TMB estimates from commonly used tumor-only sequencing panels substantially overclassified individuals into the TMB-high group, especially in non-Europeans. This bias was particularly pronounced in patients with Asian or African ancestry. Based on the results, TMB-high misclassifications would be expected to impact 21% of patients of European ancestry, compared to 37% and 44% of patients of Asian or African descent, respectively.

"If this holds in the general patient , it will have a substantial impact on treatment selection for many patients," Gusev says. "It's important to note that this is a purely technical bias. The study proposes a computational approach to correct tumor-only TMB estimates and an approach to calculating the correction that should be broadly applicable."

As a proof-of-concept, the authors next applied their TMB recalibration method to ICI-treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The TMB-high classification was significantly associated with improved outcomes only in European ancestries, warranting validation in non-European ancestry populations. "This does not mean TMB should not be used as a biomarker for non-European ancestry individuals, but it does mean that much more study and is needed to determine the precise thresholds to be used to optimize the treatment outcome," Gusev says. "We also hope this emphasizes the broader importance of evaluating accuracy in diverse populations."

Additional analyses revealed that MGA gene alterations were associated with longer overall survival and time to ICI failure in Europeans, were not associated with outcomes in Africans, and were associated with worse outcomes in Asians. "We observed ancestry-specific effects at some individual driver genes, suggesting that this phenomenon may not be unique to TMB, but also hold for individual mutations and have implications for other targeted therapies," Gusev says.

An important study limitation includes the small sample size of non-Europeans in both cohorts. "It is critical to accelerate the collection of data and outcomes from these populations so that we can better understand how effectively TMB and other biomarkers generalize to all patients," Gusev says. "The sample size constrained our ability to investigate more cancer types, individual genomic alterations, and more granular population-specific effects—all of which could yield important additional insights."

More information: Alexander Gusev, Ancestry-driven recalibration of tumor mutational burden and disparate clinical outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors, Cancer Cell (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.08.022. www.cell.com/cancer-cell/fullt … 1535-6108(22)00386-5
Journal information: Cancer Cell

Provided by Cell Press
Citation: Cancer biomarker data is not diverse, with implications for immunotherapy patients from underrepresented groups (2022, September 29) retrieved 1 December 2022 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-09-cancer-biomarker-diverse-implications-immunotherapy.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Prostate tumor biology may be influenced by genetic ancestry

64 shares

Feedback to editors