Disease spillover risk poorly communicated, oversimplified during COVID-19 pandemic

Disease spillover risk poorly communicated, oversimplified during COVID-19 pandemic
Three simplified hypothetical sets of scenarios in which land change may either increase or decrease zoonotic disease spillover risk. Each assumes that the natural area (black) is the source of spillover, and is devoid of human presence, whereas humans inhabit the modified habitat (white). In panel (a), increasing the size of modified habitat increases edge, and therefore spillover risk, if habitat modification expands outward, but decreases edge and spillover risk if it expands inward. In panel (b), reduction of natural area to fragments introduces an interface, and therefore a risk of spillover. However, if land change continues so that the fragment disappears altogether, there is once again no interface and therefore no spillover risk. In panel (c), restoration or creation of a fragment of natural area amid modified habitat could increase spillover risk, according to theory on habitat fragmentation. As in panel (b), removal of the fragment theoretically removes that risk. Credit: BioScience (2022). DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biac075

COVID-19 has been the first pandemic that has taken place alongside the interconnectivity of the Internet. Consequently, the spread of ideas and information about the disease has been unprecedented—but not always accurate. One of the widely circulated headlines was that of the relationship between land change and the spillover of diseases from wildlife to humans.

Writing in BioScience, Andre D. Mader of the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies and colleagues survey primary and secondary literature, as well as webpage content on the subject of land change and zoonotic disease risk. Based on the patterns picked up from this literature and , Mader and colleagues describe what amounts to a in improper science communication and its possible consequences.

According to the authors, media messaging consistently described direct causality between zoonotic disease spread and , despite the fact that only 53% of the surveyed peer-reviewed literature made this association. The authors delve into theoretical scenarios that would demonstrate the difficulty of tracing the real risk of zoonotic , emphasizing that the "complexity of pathogen responses to land change cannot be reduced to one-size-fits-all proclamations."

The authors found that as the moves from primary research to review articles and commentaries, and finally to webpages, the "overstating of the evidence" increases, with 78% of secondary papers implying the land use–zoonotic spillover association and all but one of the sampled webpages making this association. The authors also noted that secondary sources and webpages often failed to mention the uncertainty associated with their conclusions.

The potential consequences of simplistic messaging and a lack of proper communication regarding zoonotic spillover can erode credibility, neglect local community's specific needs when it comes to policy making, and detract attention from other factors that can lead to zoonotic spillover, say Mader and colleagues. The authors recommend more accurate, nuanced, and explanatory dissemination of the studies on zoonotic spillover risk, arguing that such an approach would also benefit science more broadly.

As the authors conclude, "if the goal of science communication is to improve understanding, it must strike a balance: sufficient simplicity to be grasped by as broad an audience as possible but sufficient nuance to capture the complexity of an issue and contribute meaningfully to the discussion around it, especially when it goes viral."

More information: Andre Mader et al, Messaging should reflect the nuanced relationship between land change and zoonotic disease risk, BioScience (2022). DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biac075
Journal information: BioScience

Citation: Disease spillover risk poorly communicated, oversimplified during COVID-19 pandemic (2022, September 16) retrieved 5 December 2022 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-09-disease-spillover-poorly-oversimplified-covid-.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Examining the zoonotic disease risk to non-traditional pet owners

24 shares

Feedback to editors