Intravenous iron improves long-term outcomes for people with heart failure and iron deficiency
Long-term treatment with iron administered intravenously improved symptoms and reduced recurrent hospitalizations among people with heart failure and iron deficiency, according to late-breaking research presented today at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2022. The meeting, held in person in Chicago and virtually, Nov. 5–7, 2022, is a premier global exchange of the latest scientific advancements, research and evidence-based clinical practice updates in cardiovascular science.
According to the American Heart Association, at least one in every five adults in the U.S. may develop heart failure. Iron deficiency is common in people with heart failure, and it is associated with impaired quality of life, poor exercise capacity and a higher risk of hospitalization or death. Previous research has shown that iron deficiency among people with heart failure may be quickly corrected with intravenous (IV) infusion of iron.
"Despite several great therapeutic successes in recent decades, many people with heart failure still have symptoms that restrict their daily lives, and the rates of hospital admissions and mortality remain high," said Paul Kalra, M.D., a consultant cardiologist and heart failure specialist at Portsmouth Hospitals University National Health Service Trust and honorary senior lecturer at the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. "There is an urgent need for new treatments that are safe and affordable."
Kalra and his colleagues developed the IRONMAN (Effectiveness of Intravenous iron treatment vs. standard care in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency) trial to investigate whether long-term administration of IV iron improved outcomes among adults with heart failure and iron deficiency compared to the current guideline-recommended care that does not include IV iron treatment. The study was conducted across 70 U.K. hospital sites and included 1,137 adults with heart failure and iron deficiency. The average age of participants was 73 years and 74% of participants were male.
Study participants were randomized to two groups: to receive either IV iron or not, in addition to standard care for heart failure. Those assigned to the IV iron group received additional doses at the one-month review and every four months after if iron deficiency returned. Study participants were followed for a median length of just over 2.5 years, with follow up clinic visits every four months.
"While the trial continued through the COVID-19 pandemic, there were extended periods of time when it was not possible to see patients in-person and administer additional doses of IV iron if needed," Kalra said. "This impacted the study and is likely to have reduced the magnitude of benefit seen with IV iron."
To account for these factors, a further analysis was performed on the data from the 1,063 people who were part of the trial before March 31, 2020 and whose treatment wouldn't have been as affected by the pandemic. This demonstrated a significant benefit of IV iron on the main study outcome of reducing the risk of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death, Kalra added.
The results found that, compared with standard care alone, long-term administration of IV iron had significant benefits for people with heart failure and iron deficiency.
Over the average follow-up period of two and a half years, the overall analysis suggests that:
- IV iron reduced the risk of hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death by approximately 20%.
- People in the IV iron group also reported improved well-being based on heart failure-related quality-of-life questionnaires (when initially assessed at 4 months, but not when re-assessed at 20 months).
- Long-term IV iron use was not associated with greater risk of infection and was associated with significantly fewer serious adverse cardiac events as compared to usual care.
"People with heart failure are at risk of developing recurrent iron deficiency if their iron levels are not 'topped up' regularly. These results demonstrate that repeated dosing with IV iron is a beneficial, safe and well-tolerated treatment option that may improve the well-being of adults with heart failure and iron deficiency within a few months," Kalra said. "This study builds on existing evidence such that intravenous iron may benefit a broad range of people with heart failure, including those who are hospitalized, recently discharged or attending office or out-patient clinic appointments."
Additional research is needed to confirm whether or not IV iron treatment may also reduce mortality in people with heart disease and to help identify additional markers of iron deficiency to improve diagnostic accuracy. While the study did not specifically compare IV iron to oral iron, previous research has suggested that oral iron may not be effective for people with heart failure.
The study had limitations. "The study was not blinded due to the dark color of IV iron—as compared to a clear saline placebo—and due to the difficulty of blinding patients and staff for a longer duration study," Kalra said. To reduce the risk of bias, the investigators who reviewed and validated the trial outcomes were not aware of what treatment had been assigned to each patient.
"It is important to highlight that the beneficial results were seen despite the fact that approximately 1 in 6 patients randomized to standard care alone received IV iron outside the trial," Kalra said. "This likely reduced the level of benefit seen with IV iron in the study."
More information: Link to session abstract