This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:



Atezolizumab as a primer for chemoradiation is promising for women with locally advanced cervical cancer

medical testing
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Locally advanced cervical cancer remains an area of high therapeutic need, with recent trials failing to demonstrate evidence of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy or immune checkpoint blockade administered concurrent with chemoradiation. Results from the NRG-GY017 randomized trial comparing the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab before and concurrent with chemoradiation (CRT) indicated favorable outcomes for 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and demonstrated evidence of improved immunogenicity with neoadjuvant atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

These findings were presented during the Plenary Session at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2023 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, and the abstract was the recipient of the SGO 2023 Presidential Award.

NRG-GY017 accrued 36 patients with pelvic or para-aortic lymph-node-positive, locally advanced cervical cancer and randomly assigned patients to receive either prior to and concurrently with CRT on treatment arm A or only atezolizumab concurrently with CRT on treatment arm B. Patients on Arm A received atezolizumab on days -21, 0, and 21 with CRT whereas patients on Arm B received atezolizumab on days 21 and 42 with CRT.

Median follow-up for this study was 25.8 months. The proportion of patients on Arm A with 2-year DFS was 79% versus 59% in Arm B (p=0.28). Patients in Arm A had a 69% pathologically complete or partial response compared to 40% in Arm B of the 31 patients with day 28 post-treatment biopsy data available.

There was no association found between the baseline PD-L1 status and 2-year DFS. Twenty-two patients had available baseline tumor and 80% in Arm A versus 75% in Arm B had positive PD-L1 immune infiltrate scoring (p=0.59). Arm A had 30% positive tumor cell PD-L1 scoring versus 83% in Arm B (p=0.02). Both were defined as straining at 1% or above.

"In addition to the favorable results discovered in this data, it is also crucial to note that there was an early decrease in T-cell receptor diversity and potential killing of tumor-associated T-cell receptor clones with concurrent chemoradiation, which could imply harmful consequences for . This information warrants further navigating differential sequencing of chemoradiation and ," stated Dmitriy Zamarin, MD Ph.D. of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the lead author of the NRG-GY017 abstract.

In this analysis, patients had T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire sequencing data from all timepoints. Therapy led to TCR clonal expansion in both arms, though the majority of the TCR clones were not found in tumors. The fraction of tumor-associated TCR clones that expanded in peripheral blood in response to therapy was larger in Arm A. While atezolizumab led to initial peripheral expansion of tumor-associated TCR clones in Arm A, some of the clones contracted in response to the subsequent CRT following the first cycle of treatment.

More information: D. Zamarin et al, Evolution of peripheral and tumor immune parameters as biomarkers of differential sequencing of immune checkpoint blockade and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: An NRG Oncology/GOG Study. SGO (Society of Gynecologic Oncology)

Provided by NRG Oncology
Citation: Atezolizumab as a primer for chemoradiation is promising for women with locally advanced cervical cancer (2023, March 27) retrieved 25 July 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Atezolizumab with chemoradiation is safe and demonstrates signs of immune activation in women with cervical cancer


Feedback to editors