This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


trusted source


How the defunding of prevention and effects of climate change drive the rebound of malaria in Peru

Defunding prevention and climate change drive rebound of malaria in Peru
Duke environmental health researcher William Pan, at right, talks with Peruvians about malaria control and prevention. Credit: Duke University Photo

Malaria control programs in Amazonian Peru helped reduce the incidence of the deadly parasitic disease by 78 percent. That is, until the programs ceased to operate.

Within four years of the programs being de-funded, rates where right back where they started, according to a study appearing online in the April edition of The Lancet Regional Health—Americas.

The rebound in malaria was driven not only by the removal of prevention programs, but also by , the authors said. Average temperatures in Peru have risen a half-degree Centigrade in the last 20 years and higher minimum temperatures and more intense rainfalls with flooding were shown to drive the resurgence of the mosquito-borne disease.

The Project for Malaria Control in Andean Border Areas (PAMAFRO) operated from 2006 to 2011 with support from the Global Fund, resulting in sustained and significant reductions in malaria incidence across the Loreto district of Peru.

The program had four main interventions: Distributing insecticidal bed nets and insecticide re-treatment kits; improving diagnostics with new microscopes and rapid detection kits; distributing anti-malarial drugs and training to use them; and promoting community responses to mosquito breeding areas.

The incidence of Plasmodium vivax malaria declined from 43 cases per 1000 people per year to 10 cases. Plasmodium falciparum cases declined from 14 per 1000 per year to just 2.5 cases.

"Unfortunately, malaria control has been deprioritized in Latin America, with many and government agencies reducing funding commitments. The result has been predictable—rapid increases in malaria incidence have followed funding withdrawals throughout the region," said senior study author William Pan, the Elizabeth Brooks Reid and Whitelaw Reid Associate Professor of global environmental health at Duke.

There had been 345,000 malaria cases across the region served by PAMAFRO in the year before the intervention, and just 175,800 in the final year of the program. By 2015, cases had returned to pre-intervention levels of 361,000 cases.

The study's statistics showed some variability in the program's effectiveness based on geography and which species of parasite was most prevalent. Malaria transmission proved tougher to root out in border areas at the edges of the intervention program and along river systems, where human migrations occur.

"There is a preponderance of evidence showing that sustained funding for malaria control is more cost effective than responding to resurgent transmission events, yet this fact seems to go unrecognized by funders," added lead author Dr. Mark Janko and faculty member in the Duke Global Health Institute.

Globally, between 2000 and 2020, malaria reduction programs like this pushed the disease rate down from 81 cases per 1000 people per year to 59 per 1000 per year. The World Health Organization estimates that a lasting commitment to continue pushing malaria back would need about US $5.6 billion per year, but funding in 2019 was just US $3 billion.

"We're showing that these programs clearly have worked and what human and environmental factors they need to address," Pan said. "Malaria elimination is definitely possible in the Americas, but we must have global commitments and support immediately, before climate change pushes this goal out of reach."

More information: Mark M. Janko et al, The impact of sustained malaria control in the Loreto region of Peru: a retrospective, observational, spatially-varying interrupted time series analysis of the PAMAFRO program, The Lancet Regional Health—Americas (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100477

Provided by Duke University
Citation: How the defunding of prevention and effects of climate change drive the rebound of malaria in Peru (2023, March 21) retrieved 4 June 2023 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Long-lasting insecticidal malaria nets' biological effectiveness may be short-lived


Feedback to editors