This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
The poorest UK children have worse health and educational outcomes in adolescence, new study finds
Generation Z children born into the poorest fifth of families in the UK are 12 times more likely to experience a raft of poor health and educational outcomes by the age of 17 compared to more affluent peers, finds a new report led by University College London (UCL) researchers.
The study, published in The Lancet Public Health, used data from the Millennium Cohort Study, a major study of more than 15,000 children born after the new millennium (September 2000—January 2002) who are now in their early 20s.
Researchers collected data on five adverse health and social outcomes in adolescents aged 17 years, which are known to limit life chances: educational achievement, smoking, poor health, obesity and psychological distress.
Children who were most disadvantaged between the ages of 0 and 5 were four and a half times more likely to do worse at school at the age of 17 compared to those in the highest income group. They were also 3.5 times more likely to start smoking.
Those born in the lowest income quintile group were also more likely to have a harmful cluster of vulnerabilities at age 17 and were 12 times more likely to experience all or all but one of the five adverse health and social outcomes examined by researchers, compared to those born in the highest income quintile.
However, lifting families with children from the poorest income quintile group to the next poorest group would only result in a modest reduction in the clustering of multiple adolescent adversities (4.9% according to the scenario model).
Consequently, the researchers advocate coordinated action on childhood disadvantage across health, education, social care and other public services, across the social spectrum.
The researchers suggest that policymakers should, as a minimum, aim to prevent absolute poverty in childhood, characterized today by widespread food and fuel poverty. They argue this is a necessary step but insufficient without a concerted effort to deliver coordinated public services to disadvantaged communities.
Professor Eric Brunner (UCL Institute of Epidemiology & Health) said, "Almost a third of children in the UK lived below the poverty line in 2019-20, as housing costs and childhood poverty continued to rise. The consequences in relation to future health inequalities (in diabetes, heart attack, cancer, and multimorbidity) are evident in stark terms in the experience of the Millennium Cohort. Social fragmentation on the scale we see it today is not a good plan in any sense."
Professor Richard Cookson (Centre for Health Economics, University of York), said, "To improve life chances, reduce inequality and unleash human potential, the UK government needs to find imaginative ways of providing support to the pre-school population right across the social spectrum—not only through the tax and benefit system, but also through coordinated public service delivery across organizations together with employment and housing reform."
The research was carried out by academics from UCL, York, LSE and Leeds as part of the ActEarly program.
More information: Clustering of adverse health and educational outcomes in adolescence following early childhood disadvantage: population-based retrospective UK cohort study, The Lancet Public Health (2023). On medRxiv: www.medrxiv.org/content/10.110 … 022.08.11.22278671v1