This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Heavily mutated SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.2.86 not as resistant to antibodies as first feared

Heavily mutated SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.2.86 not as resistant to antibodies as first feared
Sensitivity of BA.2.86 to neutralizing antibodies (A) Phylogeny of currently competing variants, highlighting the position of BA.2.86 (red arrow). Circles show variant growth advantage, estimated from a global Bayesian multinomial logistic regression model. Growth for variants with small gray circles (including BA.2.86) was not estimated due to low sequence volume in the preceding 100 days. (B) Mutations in BA.2.86 relative to BA.2. (C) Neutralization of BA.2, XBB.1.5, and BA.2.86 pseudoviruses by clinically relevant monoclonal antibodies. (D) Left panel: pseudovirus neutralization by serum samples taken between Sept 26 and Oct 2, 2022 (n=12), before the arrival of XBB in Sweden. Right panel: serum neutralization of BA.2.86 relative to co-circulating variants by recently (Aug 21–27, 2023) sampled sera (n=25). The geometric mean ID50 titres and the fraction of samples with neutralization above the limit of detection (20) are summarized below each group, and ID50 titres below the limit of detection are plotted at 10. IC50=half maximal inhibitory concentration. ID50=half maximal inhibitory dilution. *Reversion from BA.2 to the pandemic founder lineage. †Variant with F456L. ‡Variant with L455F plus F456L. §Present in the BA.2.86 sequences from Israel and Michigan, USA. Credit: The Lancet Infectious Diseases (2023). DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00588-1

Researchers at Karolinska Institutet who studied SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.2.86, found that the new variant was not significantly more resistant to antibodies than several other variants that are circulating. The study also showed that antibody levels to BA.2.86 were significantly higher after a wave of XBB infections compared to before, suggesting that the vaccines based on XBB should provide some cross-protection to BA.2.86.

A new SARS-CoV-2 —dubbed BA.2.86—has recently emerged that is very different from any other variants currently circulating, including many mutations in the spike gene, reminiscent of the emergence of omicron. The virus uses the viral spike to infect cells and is the main target for our antibodies. When the spike mutates, it comes with the risk that our antibodies are less effective against this new variant, and therefore that our protection from infection is reduced and that vaccines may need to be updated.

"We engineered a spike gene that matches that of the BA.2.86 variant and tested the blood of Stockholm blood donors (specifically those donations made very recently) to see how effective their antibodies are against this new variant. We found that although BA.2.86 was quite resistant to neutralizing antibodies, it wasn't significantly more resistant than a number of other variants that are also circulating," says Daniel Sheward, a Postdoctoral researcher in Benjamin Murrell's team at the Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology at Karolinska Institutet and lead author of the study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

An important question is whether upcoming updated vaccines that are based on the XBB variant will boost protection against BA.2.86. To determine whether antibodies triggered by infection with XBB may be effective against this new variant, Murrell's team also compared samples taken before and after XBB spread in Sweden.

"We also found that to BA.2.86 were significantly higher after a wave of XBB infections compared to before, suggesting that the vaccines based on XBB should provide some cross-protection to BA.2.86. However, BA.2.86 was resistant to all available monoclonal antibody therapeutics that we tested," says Sheward.

It's crucial for the public health agencies to know what the current level of immunity to this new variant is, and whether the vaccines will boost protection or updated strains will be required. Monoclonal also represent an important option for some , such as the immunocompromised—for the clinicians, it's important to know which if any, monoclonal antibody therapeutics will be effective against the variants that are circulating.

"I think the main message is that there is currently no reason to be alarmed over this new variant and that it's probably a good idea to get a booster vaccine when they are offered. However, another 'omicron-like' event is also a reminder that we shouldn't get complacent," says Murrell, Principal researcher at the Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology at Karolinska Institutet.

"We will continue to monitor new variants and the level of immunity to these in the Swedish population. We are also working on developing improved vaccines that could potentially offer broader protection," says Sheward.

More information: Daniel J Sheward et al, Sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 variant to prevailing neutralising antibody responses, The Lancet Infectious Diseases (2023). DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00588-1

Journal information: Lancet Infectious Diseases
Citation: Heavily mutated SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.2.86 not as resistant to antibodies as first feared (2023, October 2) retrieved 27 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-10-heavily-mutated-sars-cov-variant-ba286.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

New omicron subvariant largely evades neutralizing antibodies

30 shares

Feedback to editors