This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Study reveals surge in use of weight loss-linked drugs in California health system

weight loss measure
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

In a first-of-its-kind study, researchers from the University of California, Irvine have discovered an extraordinary surge in the utilization of weight loss-associated GLP-1 receptor agonists, a class of medications commonly used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, that is poised to accelerate, based on emerging clinical evidence. A GLP-1 agonist is a drug that activates certain receptors in the brain and pancreas.

Findings published online in the Journal of the American Pharmacists Association are based on a longitudinal cohort study of patients in the University of California Health Data Warehouse who were prescribed Adlyxin, Byetta, Mounjaro, Ozempic, Rybelsus, Saxenda, Victoza, Trulicity or Wegovy GLP-1 products between 2014 and 2022. The results demonstrated rapidly increased usage that's expected to continue exponentially.

Understanding the impact of this substantial shift in utilization patterns is crucial for informed decision-making by health care providers, ensuring supply stability for patients who rely on these medications, and assessing the economics of the insurance companies that cover the cost of these drugs.

"Before now, there hasn't been much information available on patient-level, longitudinal use patterns, and the recent FDA approval of GLP-1 RAs linked to substantial has generated great interest in demand projections," said Jonathan Watanabe, lead author of the study and UCI professor of clinical pharmacy.

"The results from our study of a large, diverse, statewide health system population promise to reshape the conversation around weight loss-associated GLP-1 RAs, informing health care stakeholders, policymakers, legislators, providers and patients alike."

The study sample comprised 87,935 people, of whom 47.6 percent were white, 22.4 percent were Hispanic, 7.9 percent were Asian, and 5.7 percent were Black. The mean age was 59.2 years, and 55.5 percent were female. Growth rates were estimated according to log-linear regression model analysis.

Between 2014 and 2018, only Trulicity and Victoza exceeded 5,000 annual users. Between 2018 and 2022, when Ozempic was introduced, GLP-1 RA utilization experienced rapid acceleration. By 2022, Ozempic and Trulicity had become the most popular, at 22,891 and 19,663 patients, respectively, while usage had grown to 5,937 for Rybelsus, 2,992 for Wegovy, 2,721 for Saxenda and 1,508 for Mounjaro. Victoza had dipped to 4,157 users, and Byetta and Adlyxin use was limited throughout the study period.

"This study also highlights that distinct FDA-approved uses for either diabetes or weight loss require that the priorities of patient population medical needs must be balanced," Watanabe said.

"For example, Ozempic is approved for diabetes, which is much more likely to be medically managed than being overweight. Wegovy and Ozempic are both semaglutide injections, but Wegovy is FDA-approved for weight management rather than diabetes, which impacts its use."

More information: Jonathan H. Watanabe et al, Trends in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Use, 2014 to 2022, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.10.002

Citation: Study reveals surge in use of weight loss-linked drugs in California health system (2023, October 20) retrieved 28 February 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-10-reveals-surge-weight-loss-linked-drugs.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

FDA adds warning to Ozempic label about risk for blocked intestines

0 shares

Feedback to editors