This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


The sunscreen paradox: Researchers warn of 'false sense of security'

Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Sunscreen usage is climbing, but so are melanoma and skin cancer rates: this, researchers say, is the sunscreen paradox.

"The problem is that people use as a 'permission slip' to tan," said Dr. Ivan Litvinov, an Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine and Chair of the Dermatology Division at McGill University and co-author with Dr. Sandra Peláez, Dr. Richie Jeremian and Dr. Pingxing Xie of two recent studies that explore the sunscreen paradox.

"People think they are protected from skin cancer because they are using a product marketed to prevent a condition."

Most people don't apply enough sunscreen or stay in the sun for hours after applying sunscreen in the morning. "This gives them a false sense of security," said Litvinov.

To understand the factors between varying incidence rates of melanoma in the Atlantic provinces of Canada, a group of researchers including Litvinov and Peláez conducted 23 focus groups.

In the study published in Cancers, they found that Canadians living in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island—provinces with high melanoma incidence rates—were more likely to report using , more aware of the health risks of sun exposure, and more apt to follow the UV index. Despite this, they also received more sun exposure due to and a tendency to engage in outdoor activities.

Similarly, in a second study, published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, of the United Kingdom Biobank by Jeremian, Xie and Litvinov, the researchers documented that sunscreen use was surprisingly associated with a more than twofold risk of developing skin .

The sunscreen paradox

"These combined findings suggest a sunscreen paradox, whereby individuals with higher levels of sun exposure also tend to use more but not an adequate quantity of sunscreen or other sun-protection measures, providing a false sense of security," said Litvinov.

Interventions to address knowledge and practice gaps in sun protection and prevention must consider this sunscreen paradox and the unique norms of communities around the world, he added.

"Sunscreen is important, but it is also the least effective way to protect your skin when compared to sun , rash guards, and sun avoidance. People can and should enjoy the outdoors, but without getting a sun burn or a suntan," said Litvinov.

More information: Sauliha Alli et al, Understanding the Perceived Relationship between Sun Exposure and Melanoma in Atlantic Canada: A Consensual Qualitative Study Highlighting a "Sunscreen Paradox", Cancers (2023). DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194726

Richie Jeremian et al, Gene–Environment Analyses in a UK Biobank Skin Cancer Cohort Identifies Important SNPs in DNA Repair Genes That May Help Prognosticate Disease Risk, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention (2023). DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0545

Provided by McGill University
Citation: The sunscreen paradox: Researchers warn of 'false sense of security' (2023, October 24) retrieved 26 February 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Why men, wealthy people and maritime residents are more likely to develop skin cancer


Feedback to editors