This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


trusted source


Clinical study suggests measuring uterine muscle activity could inform strategies for safer and faster childbirth

Clinical study suggests measuring uterine muscle activity could inform strategies for safer and faster childbirth
A pregnant person rests their abdomen on the SQUID Array for Reproductive Assessment (SARA). Credit: SARA Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Artificially causing—or inducing—labor is becoming increasingly common, yet this practice comes with risks and its level of success is difficult to foresee. But now, new research may offer a way to help predict outcomes and improve the process.

Researchers at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) have devised a of accurately measuring the electrical activity of uterine muscles. The results of a recent clinical study, published in the journal Current Research in Physiology, show that signals measured in pregnant patients prior to induction are strongly tied to whether their lasted less or more than 24 hours. The authors indicate that physicians could use the method to learn how patients might respond to induction and use the information to develop more effective strategies for labor and delivery.

If a pregnant person or their baby's health would benefit from beginning labor sooner, may recommend inducing the process through medication or other means. Without any reliable monitoring instruments, physicians heavily rely on physical examinations and their experience to inform induction strategies.

Taking this approach, time spent in labor varies greatly from patient to patient and there is also a risk of excessive doses of induction medication causing harm.

"Sometimes women will sit there for 36 hours after being induced and nothing's happening," said Hari Eswaran, Ph.D., professor of obstetrics and gynecology at UAMS. "We wanted to know when the uterus is prepared for labor. If we capture a physiological signature beforehand that indicates the chances of successful induction, that information can be used to personalize the approach."

In search of telling cues, Eswaran and his co-authors previously developed the Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) Array for Reproductive Assessment, or SARA for short.

Gauging the electrical activity of various parts of the body through techniques such as electromyography, or EMG, is routine in the clinic. However, from the uterus weaken by the time they reach the surface of the skin, making them particularly challenging to detect.

Instead of directly measuring electrical activity, SARA takes a back door.

Electrical current, whether passing through power cables or the muscles of the human body, always generates a around it. And if you can detect the field, then you can work backwards to calculate the that produced it, Eswaran explained. This is the approach the researchers are taking with SARA's array of 151 biomagnetic sensors.

In the new study, the authors analyzed measurements taken from 27 patients that were between 37 and 42 weeks pregnant. Each rested their abdomen on SARA's sensors, which recorded the magnetic activity produced by the uterus prior to induction. The authors converted the magnetic signals into metrics related to the , such as power. After noting how long it took for each patient to deliver, the authors examined their data and picked up on a significant pattern.

Patients that delivered their babies within 24 hours after induction exhibited four times as much uterine electrical power across entire recordings than those in labor for longer.

While none of the patients were experiencing contractions while SARA recorded signals, the results suggest that those with higher uterine electrical power were more prepared for labor, Eswaran explained.

Equipped with a tool that could help predict responsiveness to induction, physicians would be better informed in devising strategies tailored to individual patients. With further research, SARA could become such a tool, potentially providing guidance on when to administer induction medication and in what doses, which would lead to safer and more efficient labor and delivery.

"NIBIB provided grant funding over 15 years ago to support the development of the novel computational methods used in this clinical trial to predict labor contractions with SARA," said Grace C.Y. Peng, Ph.D., director of the NIBIB program in Mathematical Modeling, Simulation and Analysis. "It is so rewarding to see this project demonstrate the translational potential of computer models to improve the quality of care in women's health."

More information: Sarah T. Mehl et al, Assessing uterine electrophysiology prior to elective term induction of labor, Current Research in Physiology (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.crphys.2023.100103

Citation: Clinical study suggests measuring uterine muscle activity could inform strategies for safer and faster childbirth (2023, November 6) retrieved 27 February 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Study identifies safest, most effective outpatient labor induction methods


Feedback to editors